MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

EXCEED-ET: A single-arm multicenter study to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft (P1101) in North American adults with essential thrombocythemia.

2023· article· en· W4379337128 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lucia Masárová, John Mascarenhas, Albert Qin, Weichung Joe Shih, Toshiaki Sato, Raymond Urbanski, Oleh Zagrijtschuk, Craig Zimmerman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEssential thrombocythemiaTolerabilityAnagrelideMyelofibrosisThrombocytosisInternal medicinePolycythemia veraInterferon alfaMyeloproliferative neoplasmOncologyAlpha interferonSurgeryGastroenterologyImmunologyBone marrowAdverse effectPlateletInterferon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TPS7088 Background: Essential thrombocythemia (ET) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by a high platelet count due to an overacting JAK-STAT pathway as a result of the most common mutations in JAK2, CALR and MPL genes. There is a high, unmet clinical need for safe and effective treatment options for patients with ET who require cytoreduction, both naïve and previously exposed to hydroxyurea (HU) or anagrelide (ANA). In addition to blood count control and thrombohemorrhagic risk reduction, treatment for ET should also halt/prevent disease progression to post-ET myelofibrosis. Reduction in variant allele frequency and changes in marrow morphology may lead to the elimination of the malignant clone, and treatment with an interferon may achieve this outcome. Interferons have been used in the treatment of MPNs for over 30 years with well-established improvements in hematological and molecular rates, but interferons are not approved by a regulatory agency for the treatment of ET. The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft, a new generation interferon alfa, in adults with ET who live in the US or Canada. Methods: This single-arm, open-label study includes a 28-day screening period, a 12-month treatment phase, and a 28-day follow-up period, for a total trial duration of 14 months. An extension phase will supply ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft to patients deriving benefit for a total of 3 years of treatment. Adults diagnosed with ET according to the WHO 2016 criteria with a platelet count at screening > 450 x 109/L, cytoreductive treatment naïve, or with prior use or currently on HU and/or ANA may participate. Prior treatment with an interferon is an exclusion factor. Patients with a history or presence of clinically relevant depression, risk of suicide, or autoimmune disease may not participate. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft will be administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks at the starting dose of 250 mcg (Week 0), 350 mcg (Week 2), and target dose of 500 mcg (Week 4) and remain fixed for the 12-month treatment period. Subjects currently on HU or ANA will follow a pre-specified dose-tapering schedule. All subjects will receive low-dose aspirin unless contraindicated. The primary endpoint is a durable response defined as the proportion of subjects who achieve simultaneous peripheral blood count remission (platelets ≤400 x109/L and WBC < 10 x 109/L) for at least 80% of bi-weekly measurements consecutively between weeks 32-52, a durable resolution of disease-related symptoms according to the MPN Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score (MPN-SAF TSS), and absence of bleeding or thrombotic events. This study is being sponsored by PharmaEssentia USA. Clinical trial information: NCT05482971 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207