MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Subsequent meningiomas in survivors of childhood cancer: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS).

2023· article· en· W4379337784 on OpenAlexaff
Tab Cooney, Yan Chen, Yan Yuan, Robert Galvin, Wendy M. Leisenring, Susan A. Smith, Rebecca M. Howell, Michael Arnold, Miriam Conces, Daniel C. Bowers, Yutaka Yasui, Lisa Diller, Gregory T. Armstrong, Joseph Philip Neglia, Lucie M. Turcotte

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMeningioma and schwannoma management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMeningiomaConfidence intervalIncidence (geometry)Cumulative incidenceRadiation therapyCancerChildhood cancerPediatricsInternal medicineSurgeryCohort

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

10058 Background: Meningiomas are the most common subsequent central nervous system tumor among aging survivors of childhood cancer, yet incidence across the lifespan, occurrence of multiple meningiomas, and risk for mortality are not established. Methods: Meningiomas were identified by self-report and validated with pathology/medical records. Twenty-year cumulative incidence of meningioma (95% confidence interval) was estimated and multivariable models assessed demographic- and treatment-related meningioma risk factors. Results: Among 24,902 5-year survivors of childhood cancer diagnosed 1970-1999, we identified 472 survivors with 710 meningiomas, 145 (20.4%) of which were WHO grade 2/3. Among survivors with meningioma, 137 (28%) had ≥2 meningiomas, and 80 (16%) met criteria for meningiomatosis. The median latency from childhood cancer to first meningioma diagnosis was 26.2 years (range 5.6-48.2), and the median time from first to second meningioma (among those without meningiomatosis) was 1.4 years (range 0-30.2 years). The twenty-year cumulative incidence did not significantly decrease between survivors diagnosed in the 1970s (0.58, 95% CI 0.41-0.79) and the 1990s (0.42, 95% CI 0.32-0.55). In multivariable analysis, female sex (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.21-1.91) and all cranial radiotherapy dose levels ( > 0-30Gy, HR 57.0, 95% CI 7.93-419.60; 30.1-50 Gy, HR 228.90, 95% CI 30.89-1695.99; > 50 Gy, HR 113.29, 95% CI 15.09-850.34) were associated with increased meningioma risk, while older age at diagnosis (10-14 years, HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.44-0.82; 15-20 years, HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.22-0.55) was associated with reduced meningioma risk. Among 71 deaths in survivors with meningioma, the most prevalent cause of death was meningioma (N = 25, 35.2%). The 5-year all-cause mortality from first meningioma diagnosis was 4.20% (95% CI: 2.44-5.96%). Conclusions: In conclusion, cranial radiation, younger diagnostic age and female sex were identified as independent meningioma risk factors in, to our knowledge, the largest study to date. The risk for meningioma-associated mortality argues for assertive meningioma surveillance and treatment in this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.465
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicMeningioma and schwannoma managementFrench-language works237,207