P.078 Desynchronization in high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation of refractory status epilepticus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Recently, we showed cathodal high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) inhibits spikes in refractory status epilepticus (RSE) patients. We sought to characterize relative power changes within regional frequency bands to explore connectivity throughout stimulation. Methods: 28 ICU-EEGs from 10 patients were filtered with 1Hz-lower/127Hz-upper/60Hz-notch. Power spectral density was computed for each individual bipolar-longitudinal (excluding midline) electrode chain in delta/theta/alpha/beta/gamma frequency bands. Relative power was extracted throughout recordings by Welch’s method with 2.5-second Hanning window size with 50% overlap every 10 seconds. The average of relative powers from ≤20-minute pre/during/post stimulation windows were calculated per session/chain/band. Absolute maximal relative power change between pre-during and during-post were computed. ANOVA statistically tested for differences. Results: Change in pre-during for delta/theta/alpha/beta/gamma were respectively -0.7%/-3.1%/-2.8%/-2.1%/8.2%, and during-post were 1.3%/2.8%/2.3%/1.7%/-7%. Positive average changes are increases in average relative power where negative changes show decreases. Changes in absolute maximal average relative power between pre-during and during-post stimulation between frequency bands were significant respectively (p=0.0011, p=0.0139). Conclusions: Relative power in all bands drop pre-during and increase during-post except gamma which correlates with desynchronization being a mechanism for HD-tDCS efficacy in RSE. These frequency band power changes may imply brain connectivity changes that need to be further explored.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".