MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4379347621 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2023.129

P.025 Variable expression in Dopa-responsive dystonia

2023· article· en· W4379347621 on OpenAlexaffvenue
B Daud Shah, Emily T. Noyes, A. H. Rajput

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsSaskatoon Medical Imaging
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDystoniaLevodopaParkinsonismCarbidopaMedicineSiblingPediatricsVariable ExpressionPsychologyInternal medicinePsychiatryParkinson's diseaseDevelopmental psychologyDiseaseChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Dopa-responsive dystonia (DRD) is a rare disorder with a classic presentation of childhood or adolescent-onset dystonia. This is characterized by parkinsonism, diurnal fluctuations, and a dramatic response to low doses of levodopa. It has been reported that female carriers of the genetic mutation are more often affected than males. Methods: A 62-year-old man with DRD. He is a sibling of the first documented case of DRD with autopsy. Results: He noticed mild clumsiness at 10 years old when he would fall playing games. He gave up playing hockey in his 30s because of his balance. Neurological exam at age 49 revealed mild findings of parkinsonism and dystonia of the right leg. He was started on levodopa/carbidopa 100/25 mg 1/2 pill BID with significant and sustained improvement and resumed playing hockey. His sister had onset at age 5 with walking on tiptoes with obvious dystonia when examined at age 8; she was well controlled for many years on straight levodopa (without decarboxylase inhibitor) at a dose of 250mg TID. Conclusions: These cases of siblings with DRD exemplify varying degrees of severity among family members and genders with the same condition. Genetic results are pending and will be presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques→Same topicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases→French-language works237,207→