MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379416048 · doi:10.1353/thr.2011.a413102

Fourteen Drawings

2011· article· en· W4379416048 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
William Kentridge

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œHopkins review/Hopkins review · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt, Politics, and Modernism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer graphics (images)Computer scienceResolution (logic)ArtArt historyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fourteen Drawings William Kentridge (bio) The fourteen drawings in this issue are from a suite of sixteen called Cat, Chambers’ Encyclopedia and DVD. Each 25.5 × 37 cm. [End Page i] Click for larger view View full resolution Click for larger view View full resolution [End Page ii] Click for larger view View full resolution Click for larger view View full resolution [End Page iii] Click for larger view View full resolution Click for larger view View full resolution [End Page iv] Click for larger view View full resolution Click for larger view View full resolution [End Page v] Click for larger view View full resolution Click for larger view View full resolution [End Page vi] Click for larger view View full resolution Click for larger view View full resolution [End Page vii] Click for larger view View full resolution Click for larger view View full resolution [End Page viii] William Kentridge William Kentridge’s work meshes the personal and political in an innovative use of charcoal drawing, animation, film, and theatre. In 2009 a new large touring exhibition of his work began in San Francisco, moved on to museums in Texas and Florida, then to MoMA in New York, before continuing to the Jeu de Paume in Paris and the Albertina Museum in Vienna, with museums in Jerusalem, Melbourne, and Vancouver to follow. Kentridge has received the Carnegie Medal in 1999/2000, the Goslar Kaisserring in 2003, the Oskar Kokoschka Award in 2008, and in 2010 was the recipient of the Kyoto Prize for Lifetime Achievement in Arts and Philosophy. Copyright © 2010 Johns Hopkins University Press

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.628
Threshold uncertainty score0.531

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6280.383

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œHopkins review/Hopkins reviewSame topicArt, Politics, and ModernismFrench-language works237,207