MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Reconstructing Early Phanerozoic intertidal ecosystems: ichnology of the Cambrian Campanario Formation in northwest Argentina

2004· book-chapter· en· W4379417387 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFossils and strata · 2004
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIchnofaciesGeologyPaleontologyTrace fossilTrilobiteIntertidal zoneFaciesOceanographyOrdovician

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Campanario Formation is the middle unit of the upper Lower to Middle Cambrian Mesón Group of northwest Argentina. This formation is interpreted as having accumulated in macrotidal shallow-marine environments with extensive tidal-flat areas flanked seawards by subtidal sandbar complexes. Shallow subtidal and intertidal sand-flat deposits are dominated by vertical domiciles of suspension feeders and passive predators of the Skolithos ichnofacies (Skolithos, Arenicolites, Diplocraterion). The ichnogenus Syringomorphaz also occurs in sand-flat facies, commonly forming high-density, monospecific assemblages. Mixed-flat deposits contain hurizontal feeding, locomotion and resting traces as diagnostic components. A relatively low-diversity Cruziana ichnofacies is present in these lower-energy deposits. This ichnofauna includes presurned trilobite trace fossils (Cruziana, Rusophycus, Diplichnites), structures produced by sessile cnidarians (Bergaueria cf. B. perata) and shallow burrows and trails of vermiform organisms (Planolites, Palaeophycus, Helminthoidichnites). Tiering in these tidal-flat deposits is relatively simple. Six ichnoguilds (Cruziana problematica, Palaeophycus, Bergaueria, Rusophycus leifeirikssoni, Syringomorpha and Skolithos) have been defined. These ichnoguilds show a preferential palaeoenvironmental distribution following proximal-distal trends. Modern tidal flats are characterised by an abundant food supply derived from multiple sources, including nutrients brought in by the sea, terrestrially derived organic detritus and autochthonous food productian (e.g. primary production, faecal pellets). The inhabitants of modern intertidal areas are exposed to a double set of predators. During submergence they are preyed on by marine organisms and during emergence they are visited by enemies from the land and air. Contrastingly, the Cambrian intertidal environments functioned as refugia in the absence of continental (i.e. air and land) predators. Despite the physical stress, Cambrian tidal flats must have been protected areas where abundant food was available at almost no risk. Due to the paucity of land vegetation (and land-derived detritus), Cambrian intertidal trophic webs were almost entirely based on the organically rich marine source and most likely a significant autochthonous production. Although the picture that emerges from the Cambrian is qualitatively different, Cambrian tidal flats may have resembled modern ones in their ecological role as sites of reproductian and protection. The depth and extent of bioturbation reveal colonisation of a relatively deep in faunal ecospace by coelomate metazoans. Arthropod incursions in Cambrian tidal flats support an early colonisation of intertidal environments and indicate that representatives of the Cambrian evolutionary fauna were able to colonise very shallow-water environments, thus suggesting a significant landward expansion of the Cambrian explosion and the "Agronomic Revolution".

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it