MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379433928 · doi:10.1353/see.2010.0030

Warfare, State and Society on the Black Sea Steppe, 1500â1700. Warfare and History by Brian L. Davies (review)

2010· article· en· W4379433928 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Guido Hausmann

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Slavonic and East European Review · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicByzantine Studies and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrontierState (computer science)HistoryExtant taxonAncient historyClassicsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

740 SEER, 88, 4, OCTOBER 2010 Obsidio Iadrensis, Opsada^adra. Edited and translatedby Veljko Gortan, Branimir Glavicic,VladimirVratovic, Damir Karbic,MiroslavKurelac and Zoran Ladic. MonumentaSpectantiaHistoriamSlavorumMeridionalium ,54. CroatianAcademyof Sciences and Arts,Zagreb, 2007. Notes.Indexes.Facsimiles. 341pp. + 78 fols.HRK 200. The seriesMonumenta Spectantia Historiam Slavorum Meridionalium began publicationinZagrebin 1868,intheyearoftheNagodba. Despiteitstide,theseries was alwaysconcerned withthepublication ofhistorical sourcesilluminating Croatianhistory. Inevitably, itsearlyfecundity driedup to a trickle in both thefirst and secondYugoslavia,while- in one ofthevagariesofYugoslav nationalities policy - official supportwas in the 1950sput behinda rival series, Monumenta Turcica Spectantia etc.,published in Sarajevo. Following the re-establishment oftheCroatianAcademyofSciencesand Artsin 1991,the series waseffectively re-launched. In 2002,theAcademy published a collection of sourceson the history of fourteenth-century Splitunderthe Monumenta imprint. This latestwork,a contemporary accountoftheVenetiansiegeof Zadar in 1345-46,is itsimmediate successor. The volumeincludesa critical editionoftheoriginal Latintext,a paralleltranslation intoCroatian,a facsimile oftheearliest extant version ofthetext, and several introductory essays, in Croatianand English, thatexplorethehistorical background to thesiege, thepossibleidentity oftheauthorand hisstyle and grammar. UCL SSEES Martyn Rady Davies, Brian L. Warfare, Stateand Society on theBlack Sea Steppe, 1500-iyoo. Warfare and History. Routledge, Londonand NewYork,2007.xv+ 256 pp. Maps. Notes.Bibliography. Index.£22.99 (paperback). The blackearthforest-steppe and thesteppenorthoftheBlack Sea was a frontier zone fortheEast Slavicforest people(thepeopleofmedievalKievan Rus') sincemedievaltimes.Conflict had dominatedhere overcooperation and culturalexchangewithvariousTurkicpastoralpeople. After themidsixteenth century, afterMuscoviteRussia's conquestof the Khanates of Kazan' and Astrakhan had secureditssouth-eastern frontier, the southern frontier remainedthe mostcontestedfrontier zone forMuscoviteRussia, followed onlybyRussia'swestern borderzone.Thischangedprofoundly only withtheconquestof thenorthern shoreoftheBlack Sea by Russia under Catherine II in thesecondhalfoftheeighteenth century. The authorofthiswonderful newbook,BrianL. Davies from theUniversity ofTexas at San Antonio, explores howthethreat oftheCrimeanKhanatestimulated Muscovite Russiatoimprove itsmilitary organization alongits longand opensouthern frontier. Thisis initself an ambitious task.The story has neveryetbeenfully written inWestern historiography, butDavies'sbook offers farmorethanit initially setsout to achieve,by presenting a multidimensional accountoftheblackearthforest-steppe and stepperegionfrom around1500to Russia'sconquestoftheportofAzov in 1696.It does so by REVIEWS 741 givingbalanced treatment to all majorregionaland imperialactorsin the region: theCrimeanKhanatewhichdependedmostly on theconsideration of theOttomanSultans;theNogai,who overtwocenturies lostmuchoftheir influence; the Kalmyks, who to some extentassumedtheirpositionin the seventeenth century; theCossacks,whosecommunities had evolvedsincethe late fifteenth century along thelargerrivers, particularly theDon Cossacks and theZaporozhianHost,and sincethemid-seventeenth century theUkrainian CossackHetmanate;thePolish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, whichlost influence during thecourseoftheseventeenth century, and lastbutnotleast MuscoviteRussia. To investigate and describethe interaction of all these actorsin an area whichis, forgeographical reasonsalone, alreadyhighly complex(further and more detailedmaps than the two includedshould havebeen added)requires extensive research and higherudition. Davies has fulfilled his task superbly.The book can be recommendedto historians withvariousscholarly interests: thosewho are interested in theprocessesof (military) colonization willfind important chapters on theso-called Abatisand theBelgorodLine or on garrison towns;social historians willfinddetailed information on socialgroupssuchas theodnoduortsy' historians ofUkrainewill acknowledge thatDavies has takenthemostimportant Ukrainianhistorical literature intoconsideration (e.g.inhistreatment ofthePereiaslav agreement); military historians willreadwithinterest abouttheMuscovite wagenburg tactics, different commandstructures and foreign formations inRussia'sarmy.In the lastthird oftheseventeenth century, Muscovite Russiaabandoneditspolitical isolationand became morethana regionalpoliticalactorby participating in the Holy League againstthe OttomanEmpire.In 1696 Russian and Ukrainiansoldierssuccessfully laid siege to the Ottomanfortress of Azov, locatedat themouthoftheDon. Although thisis an accountofa worldfarremovedfrom thepresent day, Davies's volumenevertheless contains muchthatcouldbe valuablyappliedto our understanding of thecomplexities of contemporary Polish,Lithuanian, Russianand Ukrainian political relations. Historisches Seminar Universität Freiburg G. Hausmann Glomski,Jacqueline. Patronage andHumanist Literature in the Ageofthe Jagiellons: Courtand Careerin theWritings ofRudolfAgricola Junior,Valentin Eck, and Leonard Cox.University ofTorontoPress,Toronto,ON, Buffalo, NY and London,2007. xiv + 336 pp. Illustrations. Maps. Notes. Bibliography. Appendices. $75.00:£45.00. Despite thepatronageofRenaissanceartand architecture by Sigismund I (1506-48),Cracowwas nota hospitable place forwandering humanists inthe earlysixteenth century. The springs ofcourtpatronageweredrunkdryby royalservants suchasJustus LudovicusDecius andJohannes Dantiscus, while theuniversity itself was onlybeginning to reform itscurriculum. The present ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Slavonic and East European ReviewSame topicByzantine Studies and HistoryFrench-language works237,207