GliSODin® prevents airway inflammation by inhibiting T-cell differentiation and activation in a mouse model of asthma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Asthma is a chronic inflammatory airway disease characterized by a prevailing type 2 inflammation, airway hyperresponsiveness, and mucus hypersecretion and is driven by various factors among which oxidative molecules, called reactive oxygen species (ROS), play a major role. Superoxide dismutases (SODs) are enzymes that constitute the first line of defense against ROS. Melon SOD-gliadin, which is known as GliSODin®, is commonly used as a nutritional supplement that has proven antioxidant properties. Objectives: In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and mechanism of action GliSODin® in the treatment of allergic asthma. Methods: T-cell reactivation, and blood immunoglobulin were investigated. Results: GliSODin® reduced airway hyperresponsiveness, lung innate and adaptive immune response, and HDM-specific IgE production. Coculturing CD4+ T-cell with HDM-sensitized dendritic cells and GliSODin® reduced T-cell polarization into Th2 and Th17 cells. Moreover, adoptively transferred CD4+ T cells from asthmatic mice exhibited a reduced reactivation of Th2 and Th17 cells following stimulation with HDM plus GliSODin®. Conclusion: GliSODin® abrogates asthma features and reduces CD4+ T-cell polarization and reactivation. Taken together, these data suggest that GliSODin® could be used for the management of asthma symptoms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".