Bibliographic record
Abstract
Malcolm Bowie. The conclusion to these essays,which had not previouslytouched on the poetic strengthsof Proust'sprose, reminds us that Proustis not only famous for rhetoricallength but also to be celebratedfor a quite differentvirtuosity,that of pointed, dramatic and poetic brevity, the master of expansive illumination in concision, shown here by an excellent selection of moments to prove the point. We are provided with a series of closely analysed descriptions, full of allusive and alliterativephraseswith a music of theirown. UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW W. L. HODSON AntoninArtaud i: Modernitesd'AntoninArtaud. Ed. by OLIVIER PENOT-LACASSAGNE. Paris: Lettres modernes Minard. 2000. 203 pp. 30 F. A number of importantnew studies of the workof Antonin Artaud have appeared in recent years, testifying to an increasing recognition of Artaud's central place within modernism. The I993 colloquium LesJournees Artaudorganized by Simon Harel in Montreal markedthe beginning of a serious and thorough contemporary reassessmentof Artaud'scontributionto twentieth-centuryartand thought.Antonin Artaud i.- modernites d'Antonin Artaud constitutesthefirstvolume in a seriesof collections of essayson Artaudto be publishedby Les Lettresmodernes Minard. In his preface to this firstbook in the series,the editor Olivier Penot-Lacassagneindicatesthat his primary concern is to offer to the reader a multiplicity of different critical perspectivesin order to highlight the diversityof Artaud'screativity.The rosterof contributors to this new book is impressive. It includes several noted Artaud specialists,suchasEvelyne Grossman,FrancoiseBonardel,Camille Dumoulie, and, most significantly,Julia Kristeva.Kristeva'sessay'Artaudentre psychose et revolte' opens the collection, immediately afterthe introductionby Penot-Lacassagne.The positioning of her essay is apt, since Kristeva,along with Derrida and Deleuze and Guattari, was largely responsible for the rethinking of issues of subjectivity, marginality,and 'madness'via the workofArtaudin Frenchtheoryin the late I96os and the I970s. She continues to regardArtaud as a crucialfiguretoday, seeing his texts as representativeof modernistpoetic language. Forher, his workexemplifiesa 'psychose experimentale' in which 'un sujet [...] se met en proces et [...] par l'archeologie de son unite, menee dans le materiau meme de la langue et de la pensee, atteint des regions risquees ofucette Unite se neantit' (p. I6). Aside from Kristeva'sessay, the outstandingpiece is Evelyne Grossman'sarticle'Artaudet les modernes ... melancoliques'.GrossmanreadsArtaud'sworkas comparableto that of other 'melancholicmoderns'(Beckettand Celine). She usesLacanianpsychoanalysis as the basis for re-examining the maternal in his writings. Grossman makes many lucid and fascinating observations about this topic, expanding on previous work by other critics, especially Elisabeth Roudinesco. Each of the contributorsto Penot-Lacassagne'scollection attemptsto situateArtaudwithin the development of modernist thought. Not all of these attempts are successful.For example, I found Jacques Garelli's'Lecturephenomenologique de l'ceuvred'Artaud'quiteunconvincing . Garellilaboursto fitArtaudinto aphilosophicaltraditionthatremainsforeign, and unassimilable, to him. By contrast, Francoise Bonardel's comparison of Artaud'swritingsand those of Ren6 Guenon seems to me far more satisfyingand relevant. The possible influence of Guenon's ideas on Artaud has been generally acknowledged but, until now, not fully explored. Bonardel's article helps us to understandthe complex linksbetween these two thinkers.The other essays in this volume also provide useful and insightfulcritical perspectives.Jonathan Pollock's 'Humour et modernite' examinesArtaud'sreworkingof humour to create a vehicle Malcolm Bowie. The conclusion to these essays,which had not previouslytouched on the poetic strengthsof Proust'sprose, reminds us that Proustis not only famous for rhetoricallength but also to be celebratedfor a quite differentvirtuosity,that of pointed, dramatic and poetic brevity, the master of expansive illumination in concision, shown here by an excellent selection of moments to prove the point. We are provided with a series of closely analysed descriptions, full of allusive and alliterativephraseswith a music of theirown. UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW W. L. HODSON AntoninArtaud i: Modernitesd'AntoninArtaud. Ed. by OLIVIER PENOT-LACASSAGNE. Paris: Lettres modernes Minard. 2000. 203 pp. 30 F. A number of importantnew studies of the workof Antonin Artaud have appeared in recent years, testifying to an increasing recognition of Artaud's central place within modernism. The I993 colloquium LesJournees Artaudorganized by Simon Harel in Montreal markedthe beginning of a serious and thorough contemporary reassessmentof Artaud'scontributionto twentieth-centuryartand thought.Antonin Artaud i.- modernites d'Antonin Artaud constitutesthefirstvolume in a seriesof collections of essayson Artaudto be publishedby Les Lettresmodernes Minard. In his preface to this firstbook in the series...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".