MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379619757 · doi:10.1353/his.2023.a899605

“We want action now”: Indigenous Spirituality, Prison Activism, and Social Movement Mobilization

2023· article· en· W4379619757 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Sarah Nickel, Eryk Martin

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire sociale · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousSpiritualityPrisonPoliticsPower (physics)Gender studiesCriminologySociologyPolitical scienceEconomic JusticeLawMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In mid-March 1983, two Indigenous men began a spiritual fast at Kent prison near Agassiz, British Columbia, protesting the prison’s unwillingness to provide access to significant spiritual items. Soon, other outside communities including legal teams, Indigenous women’s organizations, prison justice advocates, feminists, and anarchists got involved as well. Using the Kent incident in 1983 as a launch point, this article considers how and why Indigenous spirituality became such a significant factor in shaping prison activism in these years. We suggest that Indigenous spirituality had the power to draw together and focus a wide range of political activism rooted in both Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities. What happened at Kent was a continuation of social movement activism that stretched back to the 1960s. Understanding those connections not only explains why the events took place at Kent as they did, but also helps to bring into focus a wider cast of characters who were involved in furthering activism around Indigenous spirituality. Abstract: À la mi-mars 1983, deux hommes autochtones ont entamé un jeûne spirituel à la prison de Kent, située près d’Agassiz en Colombie-Britannique, en guise de protestation contre le refus de la prison de leur donner accès à des objets importants liés à leur spiritualité. Rapidement, des communautés externes, y compris des équipes juridiques, des organismes de femmes autochtones, des défenseurs de la justice carcérale, des féministes et des anarchistes se sont également mobilisés. En utilisant l’incident de Kent en 1983 comme un catalyseur, cet article examine comment et pourquoi la spiritualité des Autochtones est devenue un facteur si déterminant de l’activisme carcéral au cours de ces années. Nous soutenons qu’elle avait la capacité de rassembler et de canaliser un large éventail d’activismes politiques issus des communautés autochtones et non autochtones. Les événements survenus à Kent s’inscrivent ainsi dans la continuité de l’activisme lié aux mouvements sociaux qui remontent aux années 1960. Une meilleure compréhension de ces liens permet non seulement d’expliquer le déroulement des événements à Kent, mais aussi de jeter un éclairage sur l’ensemble des personnages qui ont participé à la promotion de l’activisme en faveur de la spiritualité autochtone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.128

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.016
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistoire socialeSame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207