MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379621993 · doi:10.1353/mlr.2005.a826952

Ursula Gaillard (review)

2005· article· en· W4379621993 on OpenAlex
David L. Parris

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Modern Language Review · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean Cultural and National Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsOrder (exchange)Period (music)ClassicsHistoryArt historyHumanitiesLiteratureArtMedia studiesSociologyLawPolitical scienceAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

516 Reviews Mariage de raison: Romandset Alemaniques, une histoiresuisse. By Christophe Buchi. Trans. by Ursula Gaillard. Carouge-Geneve: Editions Zoe. 2001. 335 pp. SWF36. ISBN 2-88182-441-2. Though by a journalist, this is the work of a historian. Historian of what? Not so much of the languages of Switzerland (there is very little about the languages them? selves, except the relative place of dialect versus the standard form), as of the political relations between the language groups. Almost certainly, as a journalist, Christophe Biichi is principally concerned with the present. In order to explain it, pushing the causal chain furtherand furtherback, he reaches the almost mythical foundation ofthe Swiss Confederation in 1291. Whom will this interest?Well, anybody who knows what rostigrabenis foropeners; all those who have a historical, political, or literary interest either in Switzerland or other multilingual countries (Canada would be an obvious point of comparison, and most of the foreign works listed in the ample bibliography are from Canada/Quebec). There is no unseemly rush for the present, however: the post-First World War period is not reached until page 233 (out of 305 pages of text), and whereas the development and spread ofthe Confederation are dealt with in some detail, as the present draws near, the subsections become shorter and more allusive. Since my own approach to Switzerland has been mainly literary,and it is eminently possible to have a scholarly interest in one of the cultures of Switzerland without much reference to the remainder, I found this book salutary. It did, however, reveal a glaring gap in my knowledge: geography. I am finewith islands (the UK and Ireland are no problem?and even Italy fairlyeasy to steer my way around), but landlocked countries like Hungary, Austria, and .. . Switzerland are a black spot. Until now, I had relied on the banks of the lake to guide me from Geneva to Montreux, and mostly that was enough. Sadly, this book is not abundantly supplied with maps to help the foreign reader: there is one small map showing the current linguistic situation in shades so uncontrasted as to be confusing. Maps showing the growth ofthe Confederation, and tables giving historic populations, forexample, and French-style tableaux de synthese would have been very welcome. There is a certain amount of honest revisionism. The period 1798-1848, often seen as a black period in Swiss history, is also that in which the French-speaking cantons (apart from Fribourg) came into the Confederation as full members, and hence needs some re-evaluation ifits heritage is to be seen as a good thing. Part of the book's aim is to dispel the popular international view of Switzerland as a quiet haven of peace, tolerance, and order. It does not entirely succeed. Never? theless, in recent years the clockwork order of Switzerland has been threatened by a number of referendums in which a clear cleavage between differentlanguage commu? nities can be seen. This is not just a confrontation between the older-language cantons and la Suisse romande but between the Alemanic part of the country and all of the 'Latin' speakers?French, ltalian, and Rhaeto-Romance. The long historical intro? duction leads up to a fairlyspeedy review ofthe results ofthese referendums, revealing, as they predictably do, a greater readiness forinternational engagement in Romandie. The conclusion raises reasons for concern for Switzerland's future. Will Switzerland be Balkanized through a resurgence of ethno-nationalism? Seemingly, and for those of us who love it, not. It is worth recalling that this is a translation of Rostigraben: Das Verhdltniszwischen deutscher und franz osischerSchweiz. Geschichte und Perspektiven (Zurich: NZZ, 2000)?the lumbering German titlegives a hint ofthe underlying problem?and itis a moot point as to whether those who have German would do better with the original; those who are at ease in French might do well to read this version. In any event, it does not 'read translated', and Ursula Gailland's French is a pure delight. Trinity College Dublin David Parris ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.776
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it