MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379623976 · doi:10.1353/mlr.2004.a827031

Itinéraires du XIXe siècle ed. by Roland Le Huenen, Stéphane Vachon (review)

2004· article· fr· W4379623976 on OpenAlex
Christopher Smith

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Modern Language Review · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Cultural and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrder (exchange)Theme (computing)Norm (philosophy)Ideal (ethics)GeneralizationEpistemologyPhilosophySociologyHumanitiesComputer scienceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

780 Reviews abiding difficultyof making a generic classification of Emile is a recurrent theme here, and the difficultyitself, rather than any radical attempt to resolve it, shapes Mall's work. Thus, the tension between treatise and novel forms is apparent each time that Emile is used as an example. That is one aspect of the use of examples, but Mall will examine at length the question of exemplarity in the work, disentangling its many functions, some of which are linked loosely if at all to the distinction between novel and treatise. Emile, who is in any case not the only example invoked, must be unique, in order to demonstrate the truth of the new method, yet capable of generalization in order to prove its utility. He is regularly an ideal hypothesis but occasionally gives a bad example, so briefly representing a banal social norm rather than the alternative vision in which he generally has his place. Mall is excellent on everything relating to enunciation, clearly one of the most difficultissues for the reader of Emile. Mall shows how the authorial je disqualifies itself, rejecting any basis in experience for the foundation of a new order of education, making the Governor a necessary figure, although one who is nevertheless identified with the author by more or less ambigu? ous means. In her last chapter she takes up the issues of enunciation raised by the Profession de foi du vicaire savoyard, developing the notion of 'vicariance' generally, and ofthe substitution of one voice foranother in particular. In her meticulous sifting ofthe text, she also reminds us that the discourse ofthe vicaire is situated in relation to religious institutions, whereas the rest of the educational process described is cut offfrom institutions. That is typical of her ability to formulate general observations and judgements on the solid base provided by her detailed analyses. If Mall rejects the easy assurance of those who see only a treatise on education in Emile, she never fails into an excessive literalism that would block all global readings of the text. Her conclusion regarding the double allegiance of the work is this: 'La fiction d'Emile ne developpe pas, n'illustre pas une theorie anterieure ou separee qui serait, elle, non fictive : la theorie est l'autre face de la fiction, son autre figure' (p. 318). Quoted thus, the judgement may seem unsurprising, but the reader who follows the thread of this rich study,difficultto describe adequately in a short review because so much of its richness lies in the subtlety of the detailed readings, will know that the author has illuminated the text to an extent that has rarely been accomplished previously. This is a book to change our ways of thinking about Emile and to stimulate reflection on issues of enunciation and multiple voices throughout Rousseau's work. It is essential reading. Universite Lyon II Lumiere Michael O'Dea Itinerairesdu XIXe siecle, vol. ii. Ed. by Roland Le Huenen and Stephane Vachon. (A la recherche du xixe siecle, 6) Toronto: Centre d'etudes du xixe siecle Joseph Sable. 2001. 199 pp. ?IQ05; $28.49. ISBN 0-7727-8909-6. Drawing attention to the writings ofVictor Jacquemont, who leftrecords ofhis scien? tificexpedition to northern India in the 1830s, Yannick Resch argues that the young man's letters home are of particular interest. When Sonia Sapienza explores Charles Nodier's account of his trip from Dieppe to the Scottish Highlands, she too concen? trates more on literary than topographical aspects, and she points up the influence of Sterne's Sentimental Journey. Travellers' tales are not, however, the subject of most of the dozen papers by specialists from the French Departments of the Universities of Toronto and Montreal that are presented here. As the editors explain, readers should not be taken in by ia couleur proustienne du titre de cette collection' (p. 3); the focus is rather on the ceaseless transformations that they see as the essence of French cultural life in the nineteenth century. With its essays on major writers of the period, the volume as a whole lends support to that assertion. It hardly seems worth MLR, 99.3, 2004 781 debating, however, the rhetorical question whether or...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.377
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it