MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379624522 · doi:10.1353/mlr.2001.a825538

(review)

2001· article· en· W4379624522 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Modern Language Review · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMarxism and Critical Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPostmodernityEnlightenmentIdeologyExposition (narrative)State (computer science)SociologyAestheticsPhilosophyArt historyHumanitiesArtMedia studiesPolitical scienceLiteraturePostmodernismEpistemologyLawPoliticsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

permits any to become 'artist',simulacramay misplace ethics and ethical subjects such as 'real'Jews or others. It is here that the real force of Silverman's tightly argued tour becomes its tourdeforce. It is precisely the inherent contradictions and shortcomingsof the nation state founded on Enlightenmentpreceptsof reason and science that the individualisticliberalismof postmodernitydisplaysso publicly. For Silverman, thisJanus-face of Enlightenment and Revolution presents Francenow with a realchallenge,how to redefinehumanityanddemocracypost-postmodernity. In its many deconstructiveturns,thisbook is a rich and provocativepolitical and ethical challenge to Frenchthought and culture. By dealing with issuesratherthan institutions, the complex interface of 'le culturel' demands a response in postMarxistterms ,given thatthe neat infrastructureand superstructurerelationshipno longer pertains. While the approach taken has its own binary suppositions (a Manichaean worldviewin places, for example) and makesonly passingreferenceto laconditionfeminine, thisbook will be a key text for literary,media, orpoliticsdebates on French courses and within European Studies more widely. Because its clear exposition is sojargon-free, it will promote 'theory'as considerationwith 'practice' and thereforeopen a way of speakingabout cultureand society with ideologies and peoples stronglyin view. UNIVERSITY OFEXETER MARYORR (Euvres de chair: figures du discours erotique. By GAETAN BRULOTTE. Quebec: L'Harmattan. I998. 509 pp. Gaetan Brulotte's impressive study of the figures of erotic discourse clearly owes much in approach to Roland Barthes'sFragments d'undiscours amoureux. In fact, the doctoralthesisthat Barthessupervisedformedthe basisof thiswelcome publication on one of the most neglected of literarygenres. Encyclopedicin dimensions,and the result of more than a quarter of a century's research, (Euvres dechairhas a single ambitious aim: to identifyand catalogue hundredsof figuresof discourserecurring acrossfour centuries of erotic texts by mainly francophone writers(some of whom suchas Sade, Restifde la Bretonne,BatailleandKlossowskiare alreadywell known, but many more of whom, such as Fougeret de Montbron or Andrea de Nerciat, have remained relativelyobscure). Classifyingthese figuresunder thirty alphabeticallyarrangedheadings, ranging from 'Aisance' to 'Vetement', Brulotte offers his readers intelligent and detailed analysis of not merely literary critical but also philosophical and socio-historical interest. While 'Narration',for example, provides a thorough Genettian survey of narrativestructures,other essaysoffera mine of informationabout the historyand evolution of sexual behaviour and the social mores surrounding it. The essay entitled'Bain',forinstance,isa fascinatingaccount of changingattitudesto hygiene, nudity, and clothing across the centuries, as well as of the mythical and symbolic status of bathing as an event. Such activities make up the backcloth to the erotic action of hundreds of what Brulotteprefersto call 'erographic'works ('erotic'and 'pornographic' being too value-laden), and their manner of representation is analysedhere in depth for the firsttime. Indeed, it is the originalityof this book to offer a study of the rich social and psychological detail of a literature that the sweeping generalities of conventional criticismhave largely reduced to stereotype. Atthelevel ofform,Brulottealsoidentifiestheinnovativedimensionsof'erography': the polycentrism of the narrator, the performativity of narration, the appeal to sensesotherthan the masculinegaze, the miseenscene of the reading activityand the centralityof the reader'srole. Many of the narrativetechniques presumed to have permits any to become 'artist',simulacramay misplace ethics and ethical subjects such as 'real'Jews or others. It is here that the real force of Silverman's tightly argued tour becomes its tourdeforce. It is precisely the inherent contradictions and shortcomingsof the nation state founded on Enlightenmentpreceptsof reason and science that the individualisticliberalismof postmodernitydisplaysso publicly. For Silverman, thisJanus-face of Enlightenment and Revolution presents Francenow with a realchallenge,how to redefinehumanityanddemocracypost-postmodernity. In its many deconstructiveturns,thisbook is a rich and provocativepolitical and ethical challenge to Frenchthought and culture. By dealing with issuesratherthan institutions, the complex interface of 'le culturel' demands a response in postMarxistterms ,given thatthe neat infrastructureand superstructurerelationshipno longer pertains. While the approach taken has its own binary suppositions (a Manichaean worldviewin places, for example) and makesonly passingreferenceto laconditionfeminine, thisbook will be a key text for literary,media, orpoliticsdebates on French courses and within European Studies more widely. Because its clear exposition is sojargon-free, it will promote 'theory'as considerationwith 'practice' and thereforeopen a way of speakingabout cultureand society with ideologies and peoples stronglyin view. UNIVERSITY OFEXETER MARYORR (Euvres de chair: figures du discours erotique. By GAETAN BRULOTTE. Quebec: L'Harmattan. I998. 509 pp. Gaetan Brulotte's impressive study of the figures of erotic...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.879
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it