MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379742232 · doi:10.1177/2327857923121017

Implementing front-line ownership to improve safety in Labor & Delivery and Postpartum Units

2023· article· en· W4379742232 on OpenAlexaffabout
Carleene Bañez, Katrina Engel, Anthony Soung Yee, Silva Nercessian, Ashley Slomka, Jo-Anne Marr, Joanna Noble, Wendy Hooper, Stefano Gelmi, Nataly Farshait, Catherine Gaulton, Trevor Hall

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrauma and Emergency Care Studies
Canadian institutionsCARE Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTeamworkGeneral partnershipNursingFront lineHealth careBusinessMultidisciplinary approachPatient safetyPublic relationsMedicinePsychologyMedical educationPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oak Valley Health, a community healthcare organization located in Ontario, Canada collaborated with the Healthcare Insurance Reciprocal of Canada (HIROC) on a quality improvement initiative. In March 2022, HIROC introduced a multi-modal approach to support the Childbirth and Children’s Service (CCS) program at Oak Valley Health to better understand teamwork and communication across the program to support patient safety. In partnership with Oak Valley Health, HIROC facilitated focus groups, interviews, and two workshops with the front-line multidisciplinary team members. CCS leaders implemented change ideas to increase teamwork and communication, and also improved culture, psychological safety, and empathy between interdisciplinary and interdepartmental teams across CCS. Examples of these changes included a new Access and Flow Report, CCS Specific Bed Meetings, Education Days, and Joint Charge Nurse Meetings. Since implementing these changes, employee engagement results have been positive. The CCS leaders plan to maintain implemented changes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.133

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health CareSame topicTrauma and Emergency Care StudiesFrench-language works237,207