Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Amnesty International 63-4, 112 Anambas Islands, Indonesia 24, 29 The Andreas Lemos case (1982) 301 Annual Report of the International Maritime Bureau (IMB) 16, 22 armed conflict collateral damage in 174 use of force, distinguished from piracy 142-3, 156-7, 180 armed force, use of term 156 armed robbery against ships differing definitions of 1, 14 IMO provisions 14, 226-8, 233 sovereignty and 14-15 UNCLOS provisions 142-5 UNSC resolutions 124-5 see also Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia (ReCAAP); individual incidents and cases Army War College (US) 212-13 arrest and detention 108, 130, 183, 192-3 Arusha, Tanzania 141 Asian Economic Crisis (1997) 15-16 Association of Southeast Asian Nations Bunga Melati Dua hijacking 280-81 BW Rhine attack 82 Canada bilateral agreement with Kenya on transfer of suspected pirates 140 International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers (ICoC) 224 Montreux Document 223 The Captain Stefanos hijacking 305-6 capture and disruption operations, off Somalia 147-71 applicable international law 150-53 HMS Cumberland, case study 163-9 INS Tabar, case study 165-9 international cooperation framework 148-9 military operational response 158-69 UN resolutions and 153-8 carriage of goods by sea contracts 8-9, 296-321 bills of lading 298-9 BIMCO Model Clauses 316-19 case proceedings and 299-301 charterparties 296, 299, 305 contractual voyage 309-11 delay risks 306-8 employment and indemnity clause 308-9 exceptions clauses 299, 320 frustration 306-8 liberty clauses 298, 302, 310, 334 off-hire clauses 304-6 port safety 311-12 time charter clauses 297-8, 304-9, 334 vessel hijacking, kidnap and ransom, impacts on 304-9 voyage charter 298 war, defined for purposes of 302-4 war risk and piracy, standard clauses 313-20 Carver, T. G. 258 Centre for International Law (CIL) von Hoesslin report on piracy trends 23-5 Workshop on International Maritime Crimes 23, 29-33 Chandy, Oommen 220 Charge to the Grand Jury (Burr) 260 charterparties 296, 299, 305 The Chemical Venture case (1993) 312 Child Soldier Initiative 112 China bilateral agreement with Kenya on transfer of suspected pirates 140 Montreux Document 223 naval forces in Somali waters 131, 332 participation in SHADE 106 Choong, Noel 170-71 The Chrysalis case (1983) 307 Civil-Military Fusion Centre (CFC) (NATO) 104 cluster piracy 24 coastal raiding, Type 6 piracy 79 coastal shipping/installation assault, Type 3 piracy 79 Code of Conduct concerning the Repression of Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in the western Indian Ocean and the Gulf of Aden see Djibouti Code of Conduct to Combat Acts of Piracy (DCoC) combatant, use of term 157 Combined Maritime Forces (CMF) 48, 49, 105, 108, 131, 148, 158-62, 177 Combined Military Patrol Teams (CMPT) 100 Combined Task Force 151 (CTF-151) 48, 158-61, 177 Comité Maritime International (CMI) 303, 317 Commonwealth of Nations 190 constructive total loss doctrine 278, 281-4
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.038 | 0.018 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it