MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

HEMODYNAMICS STRESS TEST USING FINGER-TO-TOE PULSE WAVE VELOCITY IN SUPINE AND SITTING POSITION IN END-STAGE KIDNEY DISEASE

2023· article· en· W4379780494 on OpenAlexaff
Sanam Khataei, Elizabeth Rico, Saliha Addhour, Catherine Fortier, Nadège Côté, Amira Tairi, Mohsen Agharazii

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hypertension · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsHôtel-Dieu de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupine positionMedicinePulse wave velocitySittingArterial stiffnessEnd stage renal diseaseCardiologyBlood pressureHemodynamicsInternal medicineHemodialysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV), a measure of arterial stiffness can either be measured by the ratio of distance to pulse transit time or, estimated based on the pulse wave profile (ePWV). Aortic PWV measurements are performed in the supine position as there is no added hydrostatic pressure along the arterial path, and the recording of the arterial pressure waveform of the femoral arterial is easier to perform. However, finger-to-toe PWV (ftPWV), a surrogate for aortic PWV, can easily be performed in other positions, such as the sitting position, giving the opportunity to examine arterial wall properties in a dynamic manner. The aim of the study was to observe the impact of the position (supine vs sitting) on the ePWV and on the measured ftPWV in patients with end-stage kidney disease. Design and method: In a cross-sectional study involving adult hemodialysis patients, we performed vascular assessments in the supine and the sitting position within the first 2 hours of their hemodialysis session. The ePWV was obtained using the Mobil-O-Graph and ftPWV was obtained using the pOpmètre®. Three measures were taken with each device. Generalized estimated equations were then used to calculate the average of ePWV and ftPWV with respect to each position. Results: In 46 patients (17 females), the average age was 71±12 years and the blood pressure was 136±24 /77±15 mmHg. The ePWV was 10.8 m/s (IC95% :10.1-11.4 m/s) in the supine position and 10.7 m/s (IC95%: 10.0-11.3 m/s) in the sitting position. However, the ftPWV was 12.1 m/s (IC95%: 9.6-14.7 m/s) in the supine position but it increased to 22.0 m/s (IC95%: 15.0-29.0 m/s) in the sitting position. This increase of 9.8 m/s was highly significant (P = 0.006) even though the brachial blood pressure and the heart rate had barely changed. Conclusions: This study shows that finger-to-toe PWV increases in the sitting position, offering us the opportunity to explore this postural changes in PWV as a possible vascular stress test.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HypertensionSame topicCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionFrench-language works237,207