MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379792260 · doi:10.1353/aiq.2017.a663049

"We Have Bigotry All Right—but No Alabamas": Racism and Aboriginal Protest in Canada during the 1960s

2017· article· en· W4379792260 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Scott Rutherford

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Indian Quarterly · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRacismHistoryHollywoodGender studiesWorld War IIMedia studiesSociologyLawArt historyPolitical scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"We Have Bigotry All Right—but No Alabamas"Racism and Aboriginal Protest in Canada during the 1960s Scott Rutherford (bio) I'm all for the Indians; I treat them like any other colored man. But in this area they are no damned good. Less than one percent will co-operate. Some of the older generation are O.K., but the young ones are no good. But that's the younger generation all over. Look at the South. Look at what's going on in Vietnam. George Miller, tourist camp operator, Kenora, 19651 As day gave way to night on the evening of November 22, 1965, four hundred Aboriginal men and women, many bused in from close-by reserves, gathered at the Indian Friendship Centre in Kenora, Ontario. They prepared to march, a new sight to the town's ten thousand non-Aboriginal residents. With cold winter air pressed against their faces, they linked arm-in-arm four persons across and began what would be a quarter of a mile trek north along Main Street. Bundled in winter coats that hid their suits and dresses underneath, they passed by the Kenricia Hotel, the Woolworth's department store, and Fife's Hardware. The sight of peaceful marchers counteracted many of the common stereotypes that marked Aboriginal bodies in early 1960s Canada. These were not Hollywood Indians dressed in war paint, nor were they the drunk, docile, passive Indians portrayed through local media.2 With local police officers in tow, the group marched to the Legion Hall and into a town council meeting led by the mayor.3 Once the marchers were inside, seated and away from the stinging cold, all eyes turned to two men who spoke for the protesters: Peter Seymour and [End Page 158] Fred Kelly. Facing the mayor and his councilors, they introduced themselves and began listing a long set of grievances. As one example gave way to another and then another, they all illustrated the denigrating nature of anti-Aboriginal discrimination in Kenora and surrounding reserves, including the various forms of economic, social, and political marginalization played out in everyday life.4 Through newspapers and radio broadcasts, news of the protest spread quickly across the country and beyond. People began referring to this moment as Canada's first civil rights march, and Kenora seemed to solidify its newfound reputation as Canada's Alabama, Mississippi, or Arkansas.5 This article has two goals. The first is to contribute to a history of the march, what motivated it, how it came to life, and what took place in its aftermath. As the volumes of reports filed by officers of the Ontario Human Rights Commission in the mid-1960s demonstrate, Aboriginal peoples in the Kenora area endured significant discrimination. The march emerged as one of numerous tactics used in an effort to challenge the conditions that shaped material and social experiences of daily life in the town and its many neighboring reserves.6 The collective oppositional response in late 1965 challenged the naturalized discourse of the "depoliticized Indians" who passively accepted their own oppression. In one small way, this work of recounting some of this history disrupts racialized discourses that still inform social hierarchies. As scholar David Austin argues, "We have to drag ourselves deeper into the gutter of race and racism in order to emancipate ourselves from it."7 This, he argues, "requires that we understand the irrational-rational logic that has facilitated its survival."8 Race, as David Theo Goldberg puts it, is "heavy." Its "heaviness" is created as "layered, volume piled upon mass, the layers or strata composed of varying substances and differentially born."9 Differentially born, differentially coded, and differentially enacted through power, yet not always visibly present. In official Canadian discourse, Austin notes, "racial categories, and by extension racism, are present in absentia, silently shaping and animating national debate while the government, state politicians, and theorists promote a neutered narrative of multiculturalism and inclusion."10 In this article, I am using the months surrounding the march in Kenora as a vehicle to understand how and why racial discourses and material practices produce certain types of presences and absences in a moment where racial tension seems...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score0.878

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0610.009
Scholarly communication0.0060.001
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Indian QuarterlySame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207