MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379794360 · doi:10.1063/5.0153479

Exploring the distinct conformational preferences of allyl ethyl ether and allyl ethyl sulfide using rotational spectroscopy and computational chemistry

2023· article· en· W4379794360 on OpenAlexafffund
Tamanna Poonia, Jennifer van Wijngaarden

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMolecular Spectroscopy and Structure
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlliance de recherche numérique du CanadaCompute Canada
KeywordsConformational isomerismChemistryChalcogenNatural bond orbitalLone pairDensity functional theorySpectroscopyCrystallographyEtherRotational spectroscopyComputational chemistryMoleculeOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The conformational energy landscapes of allyl ethyl ether (AEE) and allyl ethyl sulfide (AES) were investigated using Fourier transform microwave spectroscopy in the frequency range of 5-23 GHz aided by density functional theory B3LYP-D3(BJ)/aug-cc-pVTZ calculations. The latter predicted highly competitive equilibria for both species, including 14 unique conformers of AEE and 12 for the sulfur analog AES within 14 kJ mol-1. The experimental rotational spectrum of AEE was dominated by transitions arising from its three lowest energy conformers, which differ in the arrangement of the allyl side chain, while in AES, transitions due to the two most stable forms, distinct in the orientation of the ethyl group, were observed. Splitting patterns attributed to methyl internal rotation were analyzed for AEE conformers I and II, and the corresponding V3 barriers were determined to be 12.172(55) and 12.373(32) kJ mol-1, respectively. The experimental ground state geometries of both AEE and AES were derived using the observed rotational spectra of the 13C and 34S isotopic species and are highly dependent on the electronic properties of the linking chalcogen (oxygen vs sulfur). The observed structures are consistent with a decrease in hybridization in the bridging atom from oxygen to sulfur. The molecular-level phenomena that drive the conformational preferences are rationalized through natural bond orbital and non-covalent interaction analyses. These show that interactions involving the lone pairs on the chalcogen atom with the organic side chains favor distinct geometries and energy orderings for the conformers of AEE and AES.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.393

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicMolecular Spectroscopy and StructureFrench-language works237,207