MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379966429 · doi:10.15252/embr.202356937

LTK and ALK promote neuronal polarity and cortical migration by inhibiting IGF1R activity

2023· article· en· W4379966429 on OpenAlexafffund
Tania Christova, Stephanie KY Ho, Ying Liu, Mandeep Gill, Liliana Attisano

Bibliographic record

VenueEMBO Reports · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAxon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of TorontoCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchOregon Health and Science University
KeywordsAxonBiologyAxon guidancePhenotypeNeuroscienceCell biologyTyrosine kinaseEmbryonic stem cellCell polarityKinaseDendrite (mathematics)Signal transductionReceptorCellGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The establishment of axon-dendrite polarity is fundamental for radial migration of neurons, cortical patterning, and formation of neuronal circuits. Here, we show that the receptor tyrosine kinases, Ltk and Alk, are required for proper neuronal polarization. In isolated primary mouse embryonic neurons, the loss of Ltk and/or Alk causes a multiple axon phenotype. In mouse embryos and newborn pups, the absence of Ltk and Alk delays neuronal migration and subsequent cortical patterning. In adult cortices, neurons with aberrant neuronal projections are evident and axon tracts in the corpus callosum are disrupted. Mechanistically, we show that the loss of Alk and Ltk increases the cell-surface expression and activity of the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (Igf-1r), which activates downstream PI3 kinase signaling to drive the excess axon phenotype. Our data reveal Ltk and Alk as new regulators of neuronal polarity and migration whose disruption results in behavioral abnormalities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueEMBO ReportsSame topicAxon Guidance and Neuronal SignalingFrench-language works237,207