MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379984669 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2023-645

Abstract 645: Impact of sex differences on cross-talk between the gut microbiome, CEACAMs, and TGF-β signaling in cancers

2023· article· en· W4379984669 on OpenAlexaff
Krishanu Bhowmick, Addison Klebanov, Sahara John, Xiaochun Yang, Xiyan Xiang, Anil K. Vegesna, Kazufumi Ohshiro, James M. Crawford, Nicole Beauchemin, Raja Mazumder, Keith A. Crandall, Lopa Mishra

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyMicrobiomeImmune systemCancer researchImmunologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Sex differences, microbiome alterations and obesity are prominent factors modulating gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, such as colorectal cancer (CRC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there is a limited understanding of the interactions between intestinal epithelial and immune cells that participate in the regulation of the microbiome and the prevention or promotion of inflammation and the development of cancer. CEACAM proteins are immune and epithelial cell regulators, and some CEACAMs (CEACAM1, 3, 5, and 6) bind to pathogenic microbes. CEACAMs and mutations of the encoding genes are potential drivers of microbiome changes through altered regulation of host-immune response, through a mechanism that we hypothesize involves TGF-β signaling. We found that genetic alterations in CEACAM-encoding genes correlate with scores of TGF-β pathway activity in GI cancers in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Furthermore, nearly 40% of human GI cancers have genetic alterations in components and regulators of the TGF-β pathway. We, therefore, investigated crosstalk between pathogen-binding CEACAM1, the gut microbiome, and the multifunctional intrinsically disordered protein βII-spectrin (SPTBN1), a Smad3 adaptor in driving CRC and liver cancers. Methods: The DNA from fecal samples collected from wild-type mice or TGF-β signaling-deficient mice Smad4+/-Sptbn1+/- were analyzed through shotgun metagenomics sequencing to identify changes in gut microbiota composition. We examined CEACAM expression, changes in the T cell populations, liver inflammation, and cancer in tissues from liver-specific βII-spectrin knockout (LSKO) mice fed a Western diet. Results: Mice heterozygous for the Sptbn1 gene (Sptbn1+/-) combined with heterozygosity of Smad4 (Smad4+/-Sptbn1+/-) spontaneously developed GI cancers, in the C57BL/6J genetic background. These mice exhibit an increased bacterial species associated with CRC in humans (C. septicum) and decreased commensal gut microbes associated with a healthy microbiome (B. vulgatus, P. distasonis). In addition, male Sptbn1+/- mice spontaneously developed HCC and showed reduced regulatory T (Treg) cells, whereas female mice did not, suggesting that βII-spectrin has a role in immune cell homeostasis that may affect tumor suppression. Single cell analyses revealed that Ceacam1 expression decreases in hepatocytes in mice fed a Western diet. CEACAM1 levels are restored to normal in tissues from liver-specific βII-spectrin knockout (LSKO) mice. Furthermore, we observed diet-induced changes in the T cell populations, liver inflammation, and cancer are also blocked in LSKO mice. Conclusion: Our study highlights how two critical pathways, TGF-β signaling and immune mediators CEACAM1 and 5, can drive inflammation and cancer through microbiome alterations with host sex having marked impact on the relevant signaling pathways. Citation Format: Krishanu Bhowmick, Addison Klebanov, Sahara John, Xiaochun Yang, Xiyan Xiang, Anil Vegesna, Kazufumi Ohshiro, James M. Crawford, Nicole Beauchemin, Raja Mazumder, Keith A. Crandall, Lopa Mishra. Impact of sex differences on cross-talk between the gut microbiome, CEACAMs, and TGF-β signaling in cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 645.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicInflammatory mediators and NSAID effectsFrench-language works237,207