<i>Mesoaciditogaceae</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Me.so.a.ci.di.to.ga.ce'ae. N.L. fem. n. Mesoaciditoga type genus of the family; L. fen, pl. n. suff. ‐aceae, ending denoting a family; N.L. fem. pl. n. Mesoaciditogaceae , the Mesoaciditoga family. The family Mesoaciditogaceae , the only family in the order Mesoaciditogales , comprises thermophilic, weakly acidophilic bacteria. The cells stain Gram‐negative and are sheathed short rods . Members of this family are heterotrophs and anaerobes , growing optimally at salinities that range from freshwater to marine seawater. Known habitats are deep‐sea hydrothermal vents and acidic terrestrial hot springs. The family currently accommodates two genera, Mesoaciditoga and Athalassotoga . Only two species have been described, but additional 16S rRNA sequences and metagenomes from environmental samples suggest that Mesoaciditogaceae may include additional genera whose representatives are not yet isolated. DNA G + C content (mol%) : 39.9–40.6 (genome analysis). Type genus : Mesoaciditoga Reysenbach et al. 2013 VP . Taxonomic and Nomenclature Notes According to the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN), the taxonomic status of the family Mesoaciditogaceae is: correct name (last update, February 2025) * . LPSN classification: Bacteria / Thermotogati / Thermotogota / Thermotogae / Mesoaciditogales / Mesoaciditogaceae The family Mesoaciditogaceae can also be recovered in the Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB) as f__Mesoaciditogaceae (version v220) ** . GTDB classification: d__Bacteria / p__Thermotogota / c__Thermotogae / o__Mesoaciditogales / f__Mesoaciditogaceae * Meier‐Kolthoff et al. ( 2022 ). Nucleic Acids Res , 50 , D801 – D807 ; DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab902 ** Parks et al. ( 2022 ). Nucleic Acids Res , 50 , D785 – D794 ; DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab776
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".