The critical mass for the unconfined vapour cloud explosion of compressed and liquid hydrogen
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The (unconfined) vapour cloud explosion (VCE) is a dramatic phenomenon that generates a severe pressure wave with a high potential to damage assets and produce injuries in the far field. This definition applies also to hydrogen. Nevertheless, no clear tools and methodology have been so far developed and tested for this highly reactive gas, and even advanced numerical simulations lack validation and suffer from large uncertainties. In this view, the comprehension of the physic which subtends this dramatic phenomenon for the specific case of hydrogen is still a central issue. This paper revises some of the most adopted theories on VCE based on classical acoustic theory and models for pressure wave propagation and provides a consequence‐based, threshold (minimum) value for the critical mass of hydrogen which is needed—at a stoichiometric concentration in air—for a vapour cloud to behave as a VCE. To this regard, any non‐stoichiometric hydrogen concentration in air or lower amount of hydrogen would decrease either the flame Mach number or the total energy, thus resulting in negligible overpressure. In this sense, the effects of buoyancy, diffusivity, and weather conditions on the dispersion of hydrogen should be taken into account. The results are valid either for compressed or cryogenic liquid tanks and can be adopted for the sake of distinction between hydrogen flash fire and VCE; for the hazard analysis of hydrogen production and storage; and more in general for the risk assessment of hydrogen systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".