MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380090767 · doi:10.1093/jrls/jlad007

The Elusive Third Way? The Role of Positive Morality in <i>Recognizing Wrongs</i>

2023· article· en· W4380090767 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jean Thomas

Bibliographic record

VenueJerusalem Review of Legal Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal principles and applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoralityQueen (butterfly)SociologyEnvironmental ethicsLawPhilosophyPolitical scienceBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal Article The Elusive Third Way? The Role of Positive Morality in Recognizing Wrongs Get access Jean Thomas Jean Thomas Jean Thomas, Associate Professor, Queen’s University Faculty of Law, Kingston, Canada; Email: jean.thomas@queensu.ca Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies, Volume 27, Issue 1, June 2023, Pages 74–98, https://doi.org/10.1093/jrls/jlad007 Published: 06 June 2023

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score0.538

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJerusalem Review of Legal StudiesSame topicLegal principles and applicationsFrench-language works237,207