The development and effect evaluation of on-line probation in obstetrics and gynecology nursing in the context of Covid-19
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To explore the effect of network-based on-line probation in obstetrics and gynecology during the special period of Covid-19, the convenience sampling method selected 71 three-year sophomore nursing students as the research object, carried out online probation on TengXun conference platform, and used self-designed teaching effect evaluation questionnaire to evaluate the teaching effect./After probation, students' satisfaction on probation time arrangement, content arrangement, teaching preparation, teaching methods adopted, college teachers and clinical teachers were 90.14%, 92.96%, 98.59%, 97.18%, 94.37%, 94.37%, respectively. The overall evaluation of the completion of learning objectives and online probation reached 92.96% and 94.37%, respectively. Nursing students have a high degree of satisfaction with the teaching effect of online probation in obstetrics and gynecology nursing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it