Bibliographic record
Abstract
This book is about limit Qaujimajatuqangit.Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit means knowledge that has been passed on to us by our ancestors, things that we have always known, things crucial to our survival -patience and resourcefulness.In September 1993 our friend and colleague David Webster, a long-time northerner, asked us to participate in a project to produce a history of Nunavut from an Inuit perspective.Without hesitation we agreed to form a steering committee to guide researchers John Bennett and Susan Rowley in documenting Inuit culture.Our first meeting was held in December 1993 in Iqaluit and subsequent meetings were held in such places as Kuugaarruk/Kuugaarjuk (Kugaaruk) and Arviat to solicit the wisdom and knowledge of our beloved elders.Our objectives were to collect information about Inuit ways of life, from raising children to transportation to our belief system and our ability to make do with whatever we had.The elders from Nunavut's three regions were very supportive of this project -"Ikajurumagapta," "we want to help," many of them said -and they took the time to tell us their regional versions of stories, practices, beliefs, and values.They covered every topic and held nothing back.The death of David Serkoak's mother in the week following our very first meeting underlined the urgent need to record the knowledge of the elders.David recalls how his mother, in a quiet way, taught him to give some of his catch to people in need, to neighbours, and even to strangers, so that he could live a healthy life, and always to leave some of his catch for other animals in order to ensure the same
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.686 | 0.620 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".