Bibliographic record
Abstract
This is Raymond Mason's story.Raymond, an Elder from the Peguis First Nation, is a Survivor of the Indian residential schools and an advocate for fellow Survivors.He has been a boxer, a military private, an entrepreneur, a husband, a father, a friend, a sibling, a son.Like each of us, Raymond has lived multiple lives and various existences.Raymond's story touches on each of these.His story is a link to that of other residential school Survivors and it is inimitably unique.What you encounter here is presented in a manner that limits our interference in the story.We have curated the story.We have never told it.We are allies and friends; editors and transcribers; curators.You may read this at multiple levels.If you do not wish to encounter us at all, forsake the remainder of this preface, the afterword, and the notes.These all exist because Raymond has brought them into existence by weaving us into his story in a curatorial, editorial role.We are linked to the story as stagehands in a play, except that we have moved punctuation rather than props.Raymond decided that his story should reflect the premises of twoeyed seeing, wherein both Indigenous and Western ways of telling exist, intertwined, offering support.The oral history tells Raymond's experience.His story is truth.We have transcribed this and added notes that help to contextualize the story; we are supplementing, rather than supporting, Raymond's story.Shawn Wilson's Research Is Ceremony notes, "Indigenous people in Canada recognize that it is important for storytellers to impart their own life and experience in to the telling.They also recognize that listeners will filter the story being told through their own experience and thus adapt the information to make it relevant and specific to their life.When listeners know where the storyteller is coming from and how the story fits into the storyteller's life, it makes the absorption of the knowledge that much easier."1prefaCe: two-eYeD SeeiNG aND StorYtelliNG
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.109 | 0.030 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".