Bibliographic record
Abstract
This book is about land and power in its many forms.By extension it is about the ways in which all human history is formed, but it is written specifically about a time when possession of land was central to life and when agriculture was the very basis of it, rather than, as it was to become, something preserved for urban dwellers in eco-museums.In Ireland, my birthplace, this struggle inflamed the passions of its people; nations were embroiled in it and from the struggle over land emerged the Irish nation and a sense of Ulster/British identity.With distance from the main events, a revisionist Irish history is now engaging with the political and economic circumstances of landlordism, as well as with the perspective of the people who experienced it.The territorial nature of the Irish struggle is well known, but though the pulse may have been more feint and less enduring, it was also a struggle over land that strengthened Upper Canadian identity in the War of 1812 and challenged Upper Canadian values in 1837, the year of rebellion.These early years from about 1788 to 1850, which included the struggle for the northern half of the continent, are the focus of this book.It was in that period that Upper Canadian, and Canadian, ideology was being developed.Part of that ideology was a conservative culture which rejected all that the United States stood for and preserved the best of the British world, itself in flux, in a North American setting that God had endowed as the new Eden.From the patrician perspective of those building the state, and contributing to its emerging raison d'être, it was clear that there was in society a social hierarchy to which they them-xxxi Land, Power, and Economics on the Upper Canadian
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".