MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380270736 · doi:10.1515/9780228007906-005

A Note on Terminology

2021· book-chapter· en· W4380270736 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robin W. Winks

Bibliographic record

VenueMcGill-Queen's University Press eBooks · 2021
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
Topiclinguistics and terminology studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerminologyHistoryLinguisticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Note on TerminologyThroughout the text Canada is normally used to designate the area encompassed by the Dominion of Canada.This term technically is incorrect for many portions of the present Dominion prior to 1867 (and for Newfoundland before 1949).When technical accuracy is required, as in dealing with legal matters, more precise terms are used.New France refers to the French colony prior to 1763.The Maritime Provinces are Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Prince Edward Island; if reference is made to the Atlantic Provinces, these three provinces are joined by Newfoundland.Initially, Prince Edward Island was called Isle St. Jean; New Brunswick was part of Nova Scotia until 1784.Toronto was York until 1837.Until 1841, present-day Ontario was Upper Canada and present-day Quebec was Lower Canada; from 1841 to 1867, they were Canada West and Canada East respectively.During both periods they were referred to collectively as the Canadas, a term that excluded the Maritime Provinces.The whole of these British possessions were the British North American Provinces and they were, despite the term provinces, colonies.The Crown Colony of Vancouver Island was proclaimed in 1849, and it did not unite with British Columbia until 1866; references to British Columbia prior to the latter date are not meant to include the island.Some Canadians regard Americans as inappropriate when applied exclusively to inhabitants of the United States, but the word is so used here.Finally, Negroes as used in this study means any people who considered themselves to be Negro, or who were so considered by the law.West Indians are included within the term except where stated otherwise.There is a substantial body of literature which traces the evolution of this word and which suggests that colored is a more satisfactory term, while many Negroes today prefer Afro-Americans or blacks.Since few white Canadians were aware of these controversies, and since many Negroes quite rightly reject colored for the value judgment it implies, Negro is given its broader, or popular, meaning here, although all of the terms are used, in context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.138

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.011
Science and technology studies0.0100.010
Scholarly communication0.0150.010
Open science0.0050.005
Research integrity0.0040.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0410.043

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMcGill-Queen's University Press eBooksSame topiclinguistics and terminology studiesFrench-language works237,207