[Translated article] Total knee arthroplasty is effective in patients with Parkinson's disease. Functional assessment and analysis of complications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introducción Gracias a las mejoras en el tratamiento médico de la enfermedad de Parkinson (EP), la esperanza de vida de estos pacientes ha aumentado. Los resultados generales después de la artroplastia total de rodilla (ATR) son controvertidos. Nuestro objetivo es analizar una serie de pacientes con EP, evaluando su estado clínico, resultados funcionales, complicaciones y tasas de supervivencia después de la ATR. Métodos Se estudiaron retrospectivamente 31 pacientes con EP operados entre 2014-2020. La edad media fue de 71 años (DE ± 5,8). Había 16 pacientes mujeres. El seguimiento medio fue de 68,2 meses (DE ± 36). Se utilizó el Knee Scoring System (KSS) y la escala visual analógica (EVA) para la evaluación funcional. Se utilizó la escala modificada de Hoehn y Yahr para evaluar la gravedad de la EP. Se registraron todas las complicaciones y se realizaron curvas de supervivencia. Resultados La evaluación media postoperatoria del KSS tuvo un aumento de 40 puntos (35 [DE ± 15] vs. 75 [DE ± 15] [p < 0,001]). La media de EVA postoperatoria disminuyó 5 puntos (8 [DE ± 2] vs. 3 [DE ± 2] [p < 0,001]). Trece pacientes informaron estar muy satisfechos, 13 estaban satisfechos y solo 5 estaban poco satisfechos. Siete pacientes sufrieron complicaciones quirúrgicas y 4 tuvieron inestabilidad rotuliana recurrente. Con una media de 68,2 meses de seguimiento, la tasa de supervivencia global fue del 93,5%. Al considerar el rescate rotuliano secundario como punto final, la tasa de supervivencia fue del 80,6%. Conclusiones En este estudio, la ATR se asoció con muy buenos resultados funcionales en pacientes con EP. A una media de 68,2 meses de seguimiento, la ATR tuvo una buena supervivencia a corto plazo, siendo la inestabilidad rotuliana recurrente la complicación más frecuente. Aunque estos hallazgos confirman la efectividad de la ATR en esta población, se necesita una evaluación clínica exhaustiva y un enfoque multidisciplinario para disminuir la probabilidad de complicaciones. Introduction Thanks to improvements in the medical treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD), the life expectancy of these patients has increased, but the overall outcome after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is controversial. We aim to analyse a series of patients with PD, evaluating their clinical status, functional results, complications and survival rates after TKA. Methods We retrospectively studied 31 patients with PD operated between 2014-2020. The mean age was 71 years (SD ± 5.8). There were 16 female patients. The mean follow-up was 68.2 months (SD ± 36). We used the Knee Scoring System (KSS) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for the functional evaluation. The Modified Hoehn and Yahr Scale was used to assess the severity of PD. All complications were recorded, and survival curves were performed. Results The mean postoperative KSS evaluation had an increase of 40 points [35 (SD ± 15) vs 75 (SD ± 15) (P < .001)]. The mean postoperative VAS decreased 5 points [8 (SD ± 2) vs 3 (SD ± 2) (P < .001)]. Thirteen patients reported being very satisfied, 13 were satisfied, and only 5 were poorly satisfied. Seven patients suffered surgical complications, and 4 patients had recurrent patellar instability. At a mean 68.2 months follow-up, the overall survival rate was 93.5%. When considering the secondary patellar resurfacing as the endpoint, the survival rate was 80.6%. Conclusions In this study, TKA was associated with excellent functional outcomes in patients with PD. At a mean 68.2 months follow-up, TKA had excellent survivorship in the short term, with recurrent patellar instability as the most common complication. Even though these findings confirm the effectiveness of TKA in this population, a thorough clinical evaluation and multidisciplinary approach are needed to decrease the likelihood of complications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".