Antivirals vs Antivirals and Steroids for Treatment of Herpes Zoster–Related Ophthalmoplegia: A Case Series and Systematic Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Up to 1/3 of patients with herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO) may develop ophthalmoplegia. Although zoster-related ophthalmoplegia (ZO) is typically treated with antiviral agents, there is controversy regarding the therapeutic role of systemic steroids. METHODS: This was a retrospective case series and case report-based systematic review. For the case series, participants were recruited from tertiary neuro-ophthalmology clinics. Eligible participants were those who developed cranial nerve palsies (CNP) within 1 month of HZO diagnosis. In the systematic review, all adults with ZO in the literature who were treated with antivirals or steroids only, or combination therapy were included. Main outcomes were initial presentation, investigations, neuroimaging, treatment regimen, and final outcomes of ophthalmoplegia. RESULTS: Eleven immunocompetent patients with ZO were included. The most common CNP was CN III (5/11), followed by CN VI (2/11) and CN IV (2/11). One patient had multiple CNPs. All patients were treated with antivirals, and 4 also treated with a short course of oral steroids. At 6-month follow-up, 75% of patients treated with combination therapy and 85.7% treated with antivirals alone had complete recovery of ZO. The systematic review identified 63 studies consisting of 76 cases of ZO. When comparing patients treated with antivirals with those treated with antivirals and steroids, patients on combination therapy had more severe ocular findings, including complete ophthalmoplegia ( P < 0.001). Age was the only significant predictor of complete recovery of ophthalmoplegia on multivariable logistic regression ( P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of complete recovery in immunocompetent patients with ZO was similar in patients treated with antivirals alone vs those treated with antivirals and oral steroids. The systematic literature review affirmed these findings. However, age may influence recovery of ophthalmoplegia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".