MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380301763 · doi:10.14785/lymphosign-2023-0006

Perspectives of women in science: data sharing in primary immunodeficiency

2023· article· en· W4380301763 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Jessica Willett-Pachul

Bibliographic record

VenueLymphoSign Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrimary immunodeficiencySick childData sharingPrimary careHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Family medicineImmunodeficiencyMedicineData collectionPsychologyPediatricsAlternative medicineImmunologySociologyDiseasePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Jessica Willett Pachul is a Clinical Nurse Specialist in the Division of Immunology & Allergy at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, Canada. In this commentary, she discusses the implications that the collection and sharing of health data can have in the diagnosis and treatment of primary immunodeficiency (PID), as well as in research and development in the field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.167
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.343
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reproducibility · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.885

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1670.343
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0160.046
Scholarly communication0.0220.031
Open science0.0090.018
Research integrity0.0670.077
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
DomainReproducibility
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLymphoSign JournalSame topicImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune DisordersFrench-language works237,207