TRLS-10. ROVER: A PHASE 1/2 STUDY OF AVAPRITINIB IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH SOLID TUMORS DEPENDENT ON KIT OR PDGFRA SIGNALING
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Pediatric patients with advanced relapsed/refractory (R/R) solid (including central nervous system [CNS]) tumors have poor prognoses. KIT alterations are common in germ cell tumors and high-grade glioma (HGG); platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) alterations are common in sarcoma and HGG. Diffuse midline gliomas with H3K27-altered (DMG-H3K27-altered) depend on PDGFRA signaling for tumor growth. However, no KIT-/PDGFRA-targeted therapies are currently approved for pediatric patients with R/R solid or CNS tumors, including DMG-H3K27-altered. The selective KIT and PDGFRA inhibitor avapritinib has demonstrated potent activity against KIT activation-loop (exon 17) and juxtamembrane (exon 11) mutants (IC50<2 nM), and PDGFRA activation-loop (D842V) mutants (IC50=0.24 nM). Cellular IC50 of wild-type PDGFRA was 95 nM. CNS penetration in preclinical models (steady-state brain-to-plasma ratios from 0.74–1.00) indicates potential for CNS antitumor activity. Avapritinib is approved to treat adults with advanced systemic mastocytosis in the USA, and in Europe after ≥1 prior systemic therapy. Avapritinib is also approved for the treatment of adults with unresectable/metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors harboring PDGFRA exon 18 mutations (including D842V) in the USA, and PDGFRA D842V mutations in Europe. ROVER, a 2-part phase 1/2, multicenter, open-label study (NCT04773782), is investigating avapritinib in pediatric patients aged 2 to <18 years with R/R solid tumors dependent on KIT or PDGFRA signaling, including DMG-H3K27-altered. Objectives include safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics. Part 1 will enroll ≥12 patients; the primary endpoint is to determine the recommended Part 2 dose (RP2D). Part 2 will enroll ≥25 patients at the RP2D; the primary endpoint is objective response rate per RECIST v1.1 for solid tumors and Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology for CNS tumors. Avapritinib once daily will be administered in continuous 28-day cycles. Study enrollment is planned at 26 sites in 9 countries, including North America, Europe, and Asia/Pacific.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".