MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380324871 · doi:10.29169/1927-5129.2023.19.03

Theoretical Investigation of the Charge Transport Properties of the DPTTA p-Type Single Crystal to the Ambipolar DPTTA-F4TCNQ Cocrystal

2023· article· en· W4380324871 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zhelin Ding, Qiqi Mu, Junle Ren, Yuyao Li, Qiguang Shen, Li Zhang, Shoufeng Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Basic & Applied Sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicOrganic and Molecular Conductors Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmbipolar diffusionCocrystalCharge (physics)Density functional theorySingle crystalCoupling (piping)Kinetic energyChemistryMonte Carlo methodPhysicsChemical physicsMoleculeComputational chemistryMaterials scienceElectronCrystallographyQuantum mechanicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our research has been conducted on the charge transport properties of the single-crystal DPTTA and the cocrystal DPTTA-F4TCNQ using the density functional theory coupled with incoherent charge-hopping model. Charge mobility is primarily considered from the combination of reorganization energy and charge transfer integral, which are important parameters in model of the charge-hopping model. The reorganization energy of DPTTA in both single-crystal and cocrystal forms exhibits similar values. Consistent with the properties of super-exchange coupling and direct coupling when under the same type of coupling mechanism, it decreases with increasing distance from the core molecule. We conclude this section by using kinetic Monte Carlo combined with Einstein's equation to derive the charge mobility, and find it to be consistent with the theoretical analysis. In our study, we propose corresponding theoretical guidelines for the rational realization of the ambipolarity of D-A complexes, hoping to contribute to the understanding and rational design of the basic mechanism of D-A complexes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.878

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Basic & Applied SciencesSame topicOrganic and Molecular Conductors ResearchFrench-language works237,207