MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380358272 · doi:10.3386/w31328

School Choice, Competition, and Aggregate School Quality

2023· report· en· W4380358272 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Gilraine, Uros Petronijevic, John Singleton

Bibliographic record

VenueNational Bureau of Economic Research · 2023
Typereport
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSchool Choice and Performance
Canadian institutionsYork UniversitySimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompetition (biology)Aggregate (composite)Quality (philosophy)School choiceComputer scienceEconomicsBiologyMaterials sciencePhysicsEcologyNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper develops and estimates an empirical framework that evaluates the impact of charter school choice on education quality in the aggregate.We estimate the model using student-level data from North Carolina.We find that North Carolina's lifting of its statewide charter school cap raised the average public school's value-added by around 0.01 standard deviations (on the student test score distribution).We calculate the total human capital returns of the expansion at above $100,000 per charter school enrollee.We further show that competition drives the aggregate gains; test score impacts on students induced into charter schools by the policy are negative.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.585
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.548
GPT teacher head0.604
Teacher spread0.056 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNational Bureau of Economic ResearchSame topicSchool Choice and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207