MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4380359043 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noad073.195

IMMU-08. SALVAGE IMMUNOTHERAPIES FOR REPLICATION REPAIR DEFICIENT (RRD) HIGH-GRADE GLIOMA FAILING ANTI-PD1 MONOTHERAPY: AN IRRDC REPORT

2023· article· en· W4380359043 on OpenAlexaff
Anirban Das, Nicholas R. Fernandez, Adrian Levine, Vanessa Bianchi, Lucie Stengs, Melissa Edwards, Liana Nobre, Trevor J. Pugh, Derek S. Tsang, Birgit Ertl‐Wagner, Daniel A. Morgenstern, Éric Bouffet, Cynthia Hawkins, Uri Tabori

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIpilimumabMedicineNivolumabImmunotherapyInternal medicineProgressive diseaseImmune checkpointSalvage therapyOncologyExpanded accessProgression-free survivalBlockadeSurgeryChemotherapyCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND Although the initial response to immune-checkpoint inhibition (ICI) for patients with DNA replication-repair deficient high-grade glioma (RRD-HGG) is encouraging, the role of immune-based salvage approaches for those progressing on anti-PD1 monotherapy is unknown. METHODS We performed an international registry study of patients managed using central molecular, genomic, radiological review and treatment recommendations between 2015-2021. Post-progression treatment included re-irradiation where feasible, and continuation of anti-PD1 with anti-CTLA4 (ipilimumab), or a MEK-inhibitor (MEKi). Outcomes included radiological response (iRANO), toxicity, second progression-free (PFS2) and overall survival (OS2). Companion biomarkers were performed centrally. RESULTS Among 75 patients with RRD-HGG receiving PD-1 blockade, 20 are progression-free at a median follow-up of 44.6-months. For 55 patients with relapsed/progressive tumors, continuation of ICI (n=38) resulted in median OS2 of 11.6-months (51% alive) versus 1.2-months when ICI was discontinued (n=17; no survivors, p<0.001). The combination of ipilimumab/nivolumab (n=24) resulted in response/stable disease in 75% with median OS2 of 12.1-months but high autoimmune toxicities (54%). The addition of MEKi led to response in 3/5 patients with prolonged survival. The addition of re-irradiation improved median OS2, especially in tumors with lower mutation burden (p=0.002), and those who received ipilimumab (median OS2=33-months). Several biological insights were gained. Early radiological ‘flare’ in 33% of RRD-HGG on combined immunotherapy and radiation were associated with immunogenic radiation induced signatures. MEKi responses were associated with reinvigoration of peripheral immune response. Finally, delayed, sustained responses were observed in ultra-hypermutant RRD-HGG exhibiting changes in somatic mutational spectra. CONCLUSION These data suggest that the continuous mutagenesis renders hypermutant RRD-HGG susceptible to checkpoint inhibitors beyond initial progression. The combination with re-irradiation and additional immune/targeted agents can maximize survival in these children and young adults. Future research should focus on biology-driven rational immunotherapy combinations that also result in lower toxicity to maximize patient benefit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→