EPEN-10. SPINAL EPENDYMOMA WITH MYCN-AMPLIFICATION – A DISEASE OF CHILDHOOD AND YOUNG ADULTHOOD WITH DISMAL PROGNOSIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Spinal ependymoma (EPN) with MYCN-amplification (SP-EPN-MYCN) was recently recognized as a distinct tumor type within the 2021 WHO classification of CNS tumors. To date, information about the epidemiological, clinical, and biological features of SP-EPN-MYCN remain sparse. Using DNA-methylation profiling, we collected a cohort of n = 71 (54 primaries, 17 relapses) SP-EPN-MYCNs. Based on the Heidelberg Methylation Brain Tumor Classifier V12.5, 95.6% (68/71) reached a classifier score of ≥ 0.9. In 68/71 cases, focal amplifications of MYCN were detected by copy number variation (CNV) analysis. Two tumors of pediatric patients harbored MYC-amplifications. Other repeated CNVs amongst the primary cases included gains of chromosomes 5 (5/54) and 18 (5/54), loss of chromosome 10 (14/51), and combined 17p loss and 17q gain (5/54). FISH (n = 17) and immunohistochemistry (n = 19) provided positive results for the detection of the MYCN-amplification. Epidemiological data was available for 63% (34/54) of all patients, showing an even sex distribution (17 female patients). Twenty-four percent (8/34) were children and adolescents younger than 20 years. The rest of the cohort consisted of an AYA-population with an overall median age of 31.5 years. Primary lesions were predominantly located in the thoracic (72%) and/or cervical (55%) spinal cord. Two patients showed extra-CNS metastasis to the humerus and the paraspinal musculature, respectively. At the point of analysis, 38% (10/26) of all patients had died, and 10/16 alive patients had already developed disseminated disease. Of patients with available information, 90% (18/20) had relapsed, whereas 10% (2/20) showed stable disease with leptomeningeal spread. Median PFS (n = 17) and OS (n = 25) were 15,5 (12 – 34) and 85 (61 – NA) months. In summary, SP-EPN-MYCN is a disease with dismal prognosis that can disseminate outside of the CNS and affects mainly children and AYA. Currently, comprehensive multi-omics analyses are ongoing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".