MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380365274 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.214304

Dual audible-range band gaps in three-dimensional locally resonant phononic crystals

2023· article· en· W4380365274 on OpenAlexafffund
Kenny L. S. Yip, Sajeev John

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Phenomena Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChinese University of Hong Kong
KeywordsResonatorPhysicsMoment of inertiaResonance (particle physics)Cubic crystal systemBand gapEffective mass (spring–mass system)InertiaBragg's lawComputational physicsCondensed matter physicsOpticsClassical mechanicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe a simple and transparent physical model for local acoustic resonances and their interactions in three-dimensional phononic crystals. The widely quoted point-mass-in-a-box representation of acoustic resonators is systematically generalized to an extended rigid body connected to massive springs, exhibiting multiple coupled local resonances. Millimeter-sized acoustic resonators over the audible frequency range typically consist of dense cores coupled to stiff shells through elastically soft material. When the local resonator is small compared to the acoustic wavelength, an elastostatic equilibrium approximation yields closed-form rational functions for its frequency-dependent, effective mass and moment of inertia. Our representation allows intuitive and quantitative analyses of the coupled acoustic modes of lattices of interacting resonators. The existence and the frequency range of local resonance band gaps are predicted by the concurrence of negative effective mass and moment of inertia. A large local resonance gap may occur in spectral proximity to a distinct gap arising from Bragg scattering. The band structure and density of states are determined by solving computationally inexpensive $6\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}6$ matrix eigenvalue equations. These agree with the exact band structures obtained by finite-element method within $3.71%$, $2.32%$, and $2.38%$ errors for the simple cubic, body-centered cubic, and face-centered cubic arrangements of the resonators, respectively. Our model enables precise design of locally resonant phononic crystals with large dual band gaps spanning a significant fraction of the audible spectrum. By increasing the mass contrast between the core and the shell in spherical resonators, we demonstrate, using a specific phononic crystal, a local resonance band gap with $126.7%$ gap-to-midgap ratio. Our model is further extended to a lattice of dumbbell-shaped resonators, resulting in a dense collection of flat bands over a narrow, predetermined frequency range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicAcoustic Wave Phenomena ResearchFrench-language works237,207