MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380485549 · doi:10.54891/2786-698x-2022-2-3

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EDUCATION MANAGEMENT MODEL AT THE LEVEL OF THE TERRITORIAL COMMUNITY

2022· article· en· W4380485549 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Serhii YAKYMENKO, Nataliia PIDLEPIAN

Bibliographic record

VenueDnipro Academy of Continuing Education Herald Series Public Management and Administration · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Issues in Ukraine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecentralizationGovernment (linguistics)State (computer science)Public administrationLocal governmentProcess (computing)Quality (philosophy)PopulationEconomic growthHigher educationBusinessPolitical sciencePublic relationsSociologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article reveals the essence of the state-public management of education at the level of the territorial community. It was revealed that the issue of providing high-quality educational services and increasing the efficiency of educational institutions was especially acute for Ukrainian communities after the start of the implementation of the process of decentralization of power and the implementation of the process of creating territorial communities, since before the reform, the local self-government bodies of communities had a very indirect influence on the educational process. It was found that in most countries of the world education management is carried out at three levels: centralized education management at the state level; management of education at the level of the region or region; management of education at the level of the territorial community, where local needs and peculiarities are taken into account. In such countries as France, Germany, the USA, and Canada, there is a system of decentralized management of education at the level of territorial communities. In such systems, the state promotes the creation of a network of public organizations that participate in decision-making and implementation of education development strategies at the local level. It was determined that this model of education management at the level of the territorial community allows for more effective use of resources, in particular financial, human and material, as well as to improve the quality of education and ensure its accessibility for all population groups. An analysis of the current Laws of Ukraine: «On Education», «On General Secondary Education», «On Out-of-school Education», «On Pre-school Education», «On Local Self-Government» was carried out, which shows that in Ukraine, almost at the state level, a regulatory framework has been formed for introduction of the model of state-public management of education. The peculiarities of the introduction of various models of education management in the USA and Poland, as well as the best practices of state and public management of education in the Slobozhan and Verbkiv territorial communities of the Dnipropetrovsk region, are considered. It was concluded that the cooperation of public authorities and residents of the territorial community should be ensured in the management of education at the level of the territorial community. Such a management model can promote the development of education at the local level and ensure its accessibility for all population groups

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.810
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDnipro Academy of Continuing Education Herald Series Public Management and AdministrationSame topicEconomic Issues in UkraineFrench-language works237,207