Use of midazolam and butorphanol to sedate harbor seal pups (<i>Phoca vitulina</i>) undergoing rehabilitation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Between 2012 and 2022, the Vancouver Aquarium Marine Mammal Rescue Centre sedated 110 harbor seal pups for physical examinations, diagnostic procedures, or treatment. A sedation protocol of butorphanol and midazolam (0.1–0.2 mg/kg each) was administered via a single i.v. injection in 171 procedures. Of these, 21 pups were anesthetized only with the injectables, while supplemental isoflurane inhalation anesthesia by mask was provided during 58 procedures; 92 other animals required intubation for respiratory support due to apnea or to achieve a deeper plane of anesthesia to facilitate more invasive procedures. Of the 171 sedations, five were euthanized due to poor prognosis and six failed to recover. Maximum sedation, sufficient for intended procedure or anesthesia induction, was achieved within a mean of 8.5 ± 5.8 min for i.v. injection ( n = 133). Sedation duration (drug administration to full recovery) without supplemental inhalation anesthesia had a mean of 30.2 min and ranged from 14 to 52 min ( n = 13). When used in stabilized young harbor seals, administration of injectable butorphanol and midazolam proved to be an effective protocol to obtain safe and reliable sedation for physical examination, minimally invasive diagnostic procedures, or as a premedication for general anesthesia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".