MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4380488018 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-2023-1193

Sensitivity of cloud phase distribution to cloud microphysics and thermodynamics in simulated deep convective clouds and SEVIRI retrievals

2023· preprint· en· W4380488018 on OpenAlexaff
Cunbo Han, Corinna Hoose, Martin Stengel, Quentin Coopman, Andrew I. Barrett

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric aerosols and clouds
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersEuropean Organization for the Exploitation of Meteorological SatellitesEuropean CommissionDeutsches Klimarechenzentrum
KeywordsCloud fractionLiquid water contentCloud computingRadiative transferConvectionCloud topAtmospheric sciencesCloud physicsComputational physicsMeteorologyMaterials scienceEnvironmental scienceCloud coverPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. The formation of ice in clouds is an important process in mixed-phase clouds, and the radiative properties and dynamical developments of clouds strongly depend on their partitioning between liquid and ice phases. In this study, we investigate the sensitivities of the cloud phase to ice-nucleating particle (INP) concentration and thermodynamics. Experiments are conducted using the ICOsahedral Nonhydrostatic model (ICON) at the convection-permitting resolution of about 1.2 km on a domain covering significant parts of central Europe, and are compared to two different retrieval products based on SEVIRI measurements. We select a day with several isolated deep convective clouds, reaching a homogeneous freezing temperature at the cloud top. The simulated cloud liquid pixel number fractions are found to decrease with increasing INP concentration both within clouds and at the cloud top. The decrease in cloud liquid pixel number fraction is not monotonic but is stronger in high INP cases. Cloud-top glaciation temperatures shift toward warmer temperatures with increasing INP concentration by as much as 8 °C. Moreover, the impact of INP concentration on cloud phase partitioning is more pronounced at the cloud top than within the cloud. Moreover, initial and lateral boundary temperature fields are perturbed with increasing and decreasing temperature increments from 0 to +/-3 K and +/-5 K between 3 and 12 km. Perturbing the initial thermodynamic state is also found to affect the cloud phase distribution systematically. However, the simulated cloud-top liquid number fraction, diagnosed using radiative transfer simulations as input to a satellite forward operator and two different satellite remote sensing retrieval algorithms, deviates from one of the satellite products regardless of perturbations in the INP concentration or the initial thermodynamic state for warmer sub-zero temperatures, while agreeing with the other retrieval scheme much better, in particular for the high INP and high convective available potential energy (CAPE) scenarios. Perturbing the initial thermodynamic state, which artificially increases the instability of the mid- and upper-troposphere, brings the simulated cloud-top liquid number fraction closer to the satellite observations, especially in the warmer mixed-phase temperature range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric aerosols and clouds→French-language works237,207→