Terms of Citizens 'Rights Restriction when Applying Measures of Criminal Procedure Forcing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article considers the nature and purpose of measures of criminal procedure coercion. The authors highlighted the grounds for restricting constitutional rights and freedoms when using coercive means. The author’s definition of measures of criminal procedural coercion is formulated, which means: the preventive action applied by the authorities conducting the criminal process in the criminal case aimed at achieving the objectives of the pre-trial investigation and trial or ensuring proper conduct of the participants in the criminal process specified in the law, if any conditions and circumstances that necessitate the use of such an impact. The issues of legality and localization criteria of personal property and non-property subjective interests of citizens are raised. The analysis of the main classifications of measures of procedural coercion is carried out, and the author's approach to the classification of measures of procedural coercion is proposed, based on the conditions and the real need to limit the rights and legitimate interests of the person. Article materials can be of practical value for employees of investigative units conducting pre-trial investigations and encountering problems with the application of procedural coercive measures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".