Effects of Hydrogen/Deuterium Exchange on Protein Stability in Solution and in the Gas Phase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mass spectrometry (MS)-based techniques are widely used for probing protein structure and dynamics in solution. H/D exchange (HDX)-MS is one of the most common approaches in this context. HDX is often considered to be a “benign” labeling method, in that it does not perturb protein behavior in solution. However, several studies have reported that D 2 O pushes unfolding equilibria toward the native state. The origin, and even the existence of this protein stabilization remain controversial. Here we conducted thermal unfolding assays in solution to confirm that deuterated proteins in D 2 O are more stable, with 2–4 K higher melting temperatures than unlabeled proteins in H 2 O. Previous studies tentatively attributed this phenomenon to strengthened H-bonds after deuteration, an effect that may arise from the lower zero-point vibrational energy of the deuterated species. Specifically, it was proposed that strengthened water–water bonds (W···W) in D 2 O lower the solubility of nonpolar side chains. The current work takes a broader view by noting that protein stability in solution also depends on water–protein (W···P) and protein–protein (P···P) H-bonds. To help unravel these contributions, we performed collision-induced unfolding (CIU) experiments on gaseous proteins generated by native electrospray ionization. CIU profiles of deuterated and unlabeled proteins were indistinguishable, implying that P···P contacts are insensitive to deuteration. Thus, protein stabilization in D 2 O is attributable to solvent effects, rather than alterations of intraprotein H-bonds. Strengthening of W···W contacts represents one possible explanation, but the stabilizing effect of D 2 O can also originate from weakened W···P bonds. Future work will be required to elucidate which of these two scenarios is correct, or if both contribute to protein stabilization in D 2 O. In any case, the often-repeated adage that “D-bonds are more stable than H-bonds” does not apply to intramolecular contacts in native proteins.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".