Twilight length alters growth and flowering time in Arabidopsis via LHY/CCA1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The plant circadian clock governs growth and development by syncing biological processes to periodic environmental changes. Decades of research has shown how the clock enables plants to respond to two environmental variables that change at different latitudes and over different seasons: photoperiod and temperature. However, a third variable, twilight length, has so far gone unstudied. The duration of twilight changes across the planet, lengthening with latitude and changing across seasons, and yet most circadian experiments are performed in lab environments with no twilight. Here, using controlled growth setups, we show that twilight length impacts plant growth and changes flowering time via the LHY/CCA1 morning module of the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Using a series of progressively truncated no-twilight photoperiods, we also found that plants are more sensitive to twilight length compared to equivalent changes in solely photoperiod. Further, transcriptome and proteome analyses indicated that twilight length alters the regulation of proteins involved in reactive oxygen species metabolism, photosynthesis, and carbon metabolism. Genetic analyses also implicated a twilight sensing pathway from phytochromes D and E, the morning elements of the circadian clock and modulating flowering time through the GI-FT pathway. Overall, our findings call for more nuanced models of daylength perception in plants and posit that twilight length is an important determinant of plant growth, development, and circadian function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".