The role of digital marketing, word of mouth (WoM) and service quality on purchasing decisions of online shop products
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of digital marketing on purchasing decisions, word of mouth on purchasing decisions as well as the effect of service quality on online shop purchasing decisions. The variables studied include digital marketing, word of mouth, service quality and consumer purchasing decisions. The types in this study used quantitative survey research. This study used data collection techniques using online questionnaire methods distributed among online shop consumers. The number of samples in this study were 630 online shop consumers. The research used simple random sampling techniques. Variable measurement used a Likert scale from 1 to 5. The data analysis technique in this study implemented Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) analysis tool. The results of this study indicated that digital marketing had a positive and significant effect on purchasing decisions, Word of mouth had a positive and significant effect on purchasing decisions, and service quality had a positive and significant effect on purchasing decisions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it