MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4380606669 · doi:10.1101/2023.06.14.545014

Predicting T cell activation based on intracellular calcium fluctuations

2023· preprint· en· W4380606669 on OpenAlexafffund
Sébastien This, Santiago Costantino, Heather J. Melichar

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéRadboud Universiteit
KeywordsT-cell receptorAntigenCytotoxic T cellBiologyT cellCell biologyPolyclonal antibodiesStreptamerIntracellularMolecular biologyIn vitroImmunologyImmune systemBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Adoptive T cell therapies rely on the transduction of T cells with a predetermined antigen receptor which redirects their specificity towards tumor-specific antigens. Despite the development of multiple platforms for tumor-specific T cell receptor (TCR) discovery, this process remains time consuming and skewed toward high-affinity TCRs. Specifically, the methods for identifying therapeutically-relevant TCR sequences, predominantly achieved through the enrichment of antigen-specific T cells, represents a major bottleneck for the broader application of TCR-engineered cell therapies. Fluctuation of intracellular calcium levels in T cells is a well described, proximal readout of TCR signaling. Hence, it is an attractive candidate marker for identifying antigen-specific T cells that does not require in vitro antigen-specific T cell expansion. However, calcium fluctuations downstream of TCR engagement with antigen are highly variable; we propose that appropriately-trained machine learning algorithms may allow for T cell classification from complex datasets such as those related to polyclonal T cell signaling events. Using deep learning tools, we demonstrate efficient and accurate prediction of antigen-specificity based on intracellular Ca 2+ fluctuations of in vitro -stimulated CD8 + T cells. Using a simple co-culture assay to activate monoclonal TCR transgenic T cells of known specificity, we trained a convolutional neural network to predict T cell reactivity, and we test the algorithm against T cells bearing a distinct TCR transgene as well as a polyclonal T cell response. This approach provides the foundation for a new pipeline to fast-track antigen specific TCR sequence identification for use in adoptive T cell therapy. Significance Statement While T cells engineered to express a cancer-specific T cell receptor (TCR) are emerging as a viable approach for personalized therapies, the platforms for identifying clinically-relevant TCR sequences are often limited in the breadth of antigen receptors they identify or are cumbersome to implement on a personalized basis. Here, we show that imaging of intracellular calcium fluctuations downstream of TCR engagement with antigen can be used, in combination with artificial intelligence approaches, to accurately and efficiently predict T cell specificity. The development of cancer-specific T cell isolation methods based on early calcium fluctuations may avoid the biases of current methodologies for the isolation of patient-specific TCR sequences in the context of adoptive T cell therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicCAR-T cell therapy research→French-language works237,207→