MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380606901 · doi:10.1021/acsami.3c03705

Bovine Serum Albumin-Protected Gold Nanoclusters for Sensing of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies and Virus

2023· article· en· W4380606901 on OpenAlexafffund
Qiming Shen, Faisal Hossain, Changhao Fang, Tong Shu, Xueji Zhang, John Lok Man Law, Michael Logan, Michael Houghton, D. Lorne Tyrrell, Michael Joyce, Michael J. Serpe

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNanocluster Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersLi Ka Shing Institute of Virology, University of AlbertaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMinistry of Advanced Education, Government of AlbertaGrand Challenges CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCanada Foundation for InnovationUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsAntibodyVirologyBovine serum albuminVirusMolecular biologyImmunoglobulin GProtein GBiologySalivaImmunologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An approach to assess severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (and past infection) was developed. For virus detection, the SARS-CoV-2 virus nucleocapsid protein (NP) was targeted. To detect the NP, antibodies were immobilized on magnetic beads to capture the NPs, which were subsequently detected using rabbit anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antibodies and alkaline phosphatase (AP)-conjugated anti-rabbit antibodies. A similar approach was used to assess SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing antibody levels by capturing spike receptor-binding domain (RBD)-specific antibodies utilizing RBD protein-modified magnetic beads and detecting them using AP-conjugated anti-human IgG antibodies. The sensing mechanism for both assays is based on cysteamine etching-induced fluorescence quenching of bovine serum albumin-protected gold nanoclusters where cysteamine is generated in proportion to the amount of either SARS-CoV-2 virus or anti-SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain-specific immunoglobulin antibodies (anti-RBD IgG antibodies). High sensitivity can be achieved in 5 h 15 min for the anti-RBD IgG antibody detection and 6 h 15 min for virus detection, although the assay can be run in “rapid” mode, which takes 1 h 45 min for the anti-RBD IgG antibody detection and 3 h 15 min for the virus. By spiking the anti-RBD IgG antibodies and virus in serum and saliva, we demonstrate that the assay can detect the anti-RBD IgG antibodies with a limit of detection (LOD) of 4.0 and 2.0 ng/mL in serum and saliva, respectively. For the virus, we can achieve an LOD of 8.5 × 10 5 RNA copies/mL and 8.8 × 10 5 RNA copies/mL in serum and saliva, respectively. Interestingly, this assay can be easily modified to detect myriad analytes of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Applied Materials & InterfacesSame topicNanocluster Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207