MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380626386 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfad063c_3517

#3517 BRAIN MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AND COGNITIVE FUNCTION IN PATIENTS RECEIVING HEMODIALYSIS

2023· article· en· W4380626386 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mei‐Chuan Kuo, Ping‐Hsun Wu, Hsiu‐Fen Lin, Tsai-Shan Wu, Yi‐Ting Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMontreal Cognitive AssessmentMedicineCognitionHyperintensityVerbal fluency testDialysisKidney diseaseLogistic regressionEffects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performanceInternal medicineMagnetic resonance imagingCognitive testCognitive declineAudiologyDementiaPsychiatryDiseaseNeuropsychologyCognitive impairmentRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background and Aims Chronic kidney disease is high risk to adverse events including stroke, cardiovascular diseases and cognitive decline. Cognitive function was known to be linked to chronic kidney disease. The Fazefa's scale, which was used for assessing white matter hyperdensities(WMH), has been reported to associate with poor cognitive performance. We aim to investigate the associations between mini-mental status examination (MMSE), Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA), cognitive abilities screening instrument (CASI) and Fazefa's scale in patients under hemodialysis (HD). Method The periventricular (PV) and deep white matter (DWM) lesions in brain MR images of 59 patients under dialysis for at least 90 days were graded by Fazefa's scale. Cognition function tests including MMSE, MoCA, and CASI were performed. Multivariable ordinal regression and logistic regression were used for identifying the associations between cognitive performance and Fazekas scale. Results Inverse associations were found between three cognitive function tests across the Fazekas scale of PV lesions (p = 0.037, 0.006 and 0.008 for MMSE, MoCA, and CASI, respectively), and higher scales were associated with lower cognitive function scores in trend; however, the association attenuated in the DWM group. In subdomains of CASI, significant differences were identified in five subdomains, including short-term memory, mental manipulation, abstract thinking, spatial construction, and name fluency; nevertheless, in DWM hyperdensities, only abstract thinking and short-term memory showed obvious correspondence. Conclusion Inverse correlation between the Fazefa's scale, predominantly in PV lesions, and cognition was detected in HD patients. The Fazefa's scale of PV lesions were associated with cognitive performance assessed by MMSE, MoCA and CASI, as well as with subdomains of CASI such as memory, language, and name fluency in HD patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207