MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 13259: Genome Sequencing in Pediatric Patients With Pulmonary Vein Stenosis

2022· article· en· W4380714968 on OpenAlexaff
Cherith Somerville, Roozbeh Manshaei, Qiliang Ding, Kelsey Kalbfleisch, Raymond H. Kim, Rebekah Jobling, Rachel D. Vanderlaan

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGenetic testingExome sequencingCandidate geneDiseaseBioinformaticsInternal medicinePathologyGeneOncologyGeneticsMutationBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) is a rare and progressive disease of the vasculature, characterized by neointimal proliferation and is frequently lethal in pediatric patients. PVS is clinically heterogeneous, and its etiology remains unknown. Insight into the genetic basis of PVS can help to direct treatment interventions and improve clinical outcomes. Objectives: To examine the genetic mechanisms underlying PVS and to compare the genetic architecture in patients with severe disease to patients with disease stabilization. Methods: We performed genome sequencing in a cohort of 18 pediatric patients with PVS. The genomic data was analyzed for clinically reportable variants and biologically plausible candidates. We used a statistical overrepresentation test to investigate the overrepresentation of gene ontology (GO) terms in patients with aggressive disease compared with stabilized patients. Results: Seven patients (38.9%) had aggressive disease, resulting in death or lung transplant, 16 patients (88.9%) had concomitant congenital heart disease, and 11 patients (61.1%) had extracardiac anomalies. In two patients (11.1%) with a syndromic presentation, we identified Pathogenic/Likely Pathogenic variants in three genes: ANKRD11, associated with KBG syndrome, FOXP1 , and DYNC1H1 , associated with intellectual developmental disorders. In search of novel candidate genes, we identified de novo variants in PAK4 , AMBRA1 , and ANKRD50 , involved in cytoskeletal remodeling, mTOR-regulated autophagy, and protein trafficking, respectively. In patients with severe PVS, we found an overrepresentation of rare (minor allele frequency <0.15%) coding variants in genes involved in blood vessel morphogenesis (FDR <0.05), protein phosphorylation (FDR <0.05), dynein intermediate chain binding (FDR <0.05), and ATP binding (FDR <0.05). No GO terms were overrepresented in the patients with stabilized disease. Conclusions: This exploratory cohort of patients with PVS provides further insight into the genetic contributions to PVS. These results suggest distinct genetic landscapes between progressive and stabilized disease. Genetic testing in larger cohorts is needed to further define the molecular pathology of pediatric PVS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→