MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 15328: Investigating the Role of Endothelial Breast Cancer Susceptibility Gene 2 in Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiotoxicity

2022· article· en· W4380763284 on OpenAlexaff
Berk Rasheed, David Michels, Sepideh Nikfarjam, Shuhan Bu, Hien C. Nguyen, Jefferson C. Frisbee, David A. Hess, Robert Gros, Krishna K. Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical TrialsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCardiotoxicityDoxorubicinMedicineDNA damageInflammationApoptosisOxidative stressCancer researchUmbilical veinCancerBreast cancerEndothelial stem cellPharmacologyImmunologyChemotherapyBiologyIn vitroInternal medicineDNABiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Doxorubicin (DOX) is a chemotherapeutic drug used to treat various malignancies including breast cancer. However, DOX use is limited by DOX-induced cardiotoxicity (DIC), which carries a poor prognosis and is frequently fatal. Accumulating evidence indicates a central role of oxidative stress, DNA damage, inducing cellular inflammation and apoptosis as common pathways during DIC. BRCA2 functions to maintain genome-wide stability by promoting DNA damage repair and also has anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory roles. Thus, the pathways of DIC; DNA damage, oxidative stress, inflammation and endotheliotoxiciy; are specifically regulated by BRCA2. However, the role of endothelial BRCA2 in the mechanisms driving DIC remain unknown. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that endothelial cell-specific loss-of BRCA2 exacerbates and prevents DOX- induced DNA damage, inflammation, endotheliotoxicity, and cardiomyocyte death promoting DIC. Methods and Results: To understand the effect of DOX on BRCA2 expression in vitro , we cultured Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVECs) and performed time and dose experiments and extracted RNA and protein to perform qPCR and immunoblot, respectively, for BRCA2. DOX inhibited BRCA2 expression in HUVECs at transcript and protein levels. We also measured the expression of pro-apoptotic p53, which appear to be up-regulated by DOX in a dose/time-dependent manner. We also have generated and characterized endothelial cell-specific BRCA2 knockout mice (BRCA2 endo ) using the Cre-Lox P method. DOX treatment to BRCA2 endo mice induced significant weight loss in comparison to wild-type (WT) mice. Echocardiography done on DOX-treated BRCA2 endo and WT mice showed significantly reduced cardiac function in BRCA2 endo mice compared to WT mice. Our qPCR data performed on RNAs extracted from DOX-treated BRCA2 endo and WT mice demonstrated significantly increased expression of heart failure markers in the heart of BRCA2 endo mice compared to WT mice. Conclusion: Our studies’ will provide a novel mechanism for DIC by elucidating the roles of endotheliotoxicity and determining whether BRCA2’s function is a critical factor for restorative DNA damage repair and recovery of endothelial cell function following DOX treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicChemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigationFrench-language works237,207