MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 15008: Hydrogel-Mediated Sustained Intra-Pericardial Delivery of Endothelial Colony-Forming Cells-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Promote Cardiac Repair Post-Myocardial Infarction

2022· article· en· W4380785379 on OpenAlexaff
Karina Pereira Gomes, Maia Ross, Anshul S. Jadli, Nadia DiMarzo, Darrell D. Belke, Paul W.M. Fedak, Vaibhav B. Patel

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiac function curveMyocardial infarctionAngiogenesisHeart failureCardiologyPharmacologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Myocardial infarction (MI) is a leading cause of death worldwide. Although available treatments improve prognosis post-MI, they do not remediate cardiomyocyte death and loss of cardiac vasculature, resulting in chronic maladaptive remodeling and subsequently, heart failure. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from endothelial colony-forming cells (ECFCs) show therapeutic potential, facilitating adaptive cardiac remodeling post-MI. However, ECFCs function is compromised in patients with type-2 diabetes, a common risk factor for MI, limiting the applicability of autologous cell-based therapies. Therapeutic administration is a further challenge, as current strategies present difficulties regarding invasiveness, retention, and efficacy. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that the minimally invasive intra-pericardial (IP) injection of ECFCs-EVs within a hydrogel would improve cardiac retention and promote sustained therapeutic release, facilitating cardiac repair in a murine model of MI. We anticipated that this repair would be greater with the use of EVs derived from wildtype mice than from diabetic mice. Methods: The impact of wildtype and diabetic ECFCs-EVs was evaluated on both in vitro EVs retention and angiogenesis. In a murine model of MI, the left anterior descending coronary artery was ligated while the pericardium was preserved. We evaluated whether IP injection is an effective and safe method of delivering hydrogels containing ECFCs-EVs, in addition to its long-term effects on cardiac morphology and function. Results: Our findings indicate that hydrogel use facilitates sustained EVs release. Besides that, the administration of ECFCs-EVs increased coronary endothelial cell proliferation, migration, and vascularization in vitro, and reduced maladaptive cardiac remodeling, improving cardiac contractility and function in vivo. These effects appear to be more pronounced with the administration of wildtype ECFCs-EVs. Conclusions: Collectively, our results underscore the therapeutic promise of ECFCs-EVs to improve cardiac repair after MI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.678
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicCardiac Fibrosis and RemodelingFrench-language works237,207